MAYNARD S. DOFFLEMYER, APPELLANT, V. EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS By Tbird
Print Email
MAYNARD S. DOFFLEMYER, APPELLANT, V. EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.
2 Vet App 2772 Vet. App. 277; 1992 US Vet App LEXIS 831992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 83
90-1078
March 31, 1992, Decided
UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS
Before KRAMER, FARLEY and IVERS, Associate Judges.
Disposition
REVERSED. REMANDED
Counsel Joseph A. Violante for appellant.
Michael P. Butler, with whom Robert E. Coy, Acting General Counsel, Barry M. Tapp, Assistant General Counsel, and Andrew J. Mullen, Deputy Assistant General Counsel were on the brief, for appellee.
Opinion
Editorial Information: Prior History
On Appeal From The Board of Veterans' Appeals
Editorial Information: Subsequent History
As Amended April 8, 1992. Second Correction April 21, 1992.
Opinion by: FARLEY
{2 Vet. App. 278} FARLEY, Associate Judge: Appellant, Maynard S. Dofflemyer, appeals a Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) decision of June 4, 1990, which purported to deny an increased rating for undifferentiated schizophrenia for which appellant had been service-connected at 100% from May 21, 1969, until its reduction to 10% effective May 1, 1989. Appellant argues that the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office (VARO) ratings decision of February 17, 1989, reducing his disability rating from 100% to 10%, and the BVA decision affirming the reduction, are void ab initio, as both the VARO and the BVA failed to apply _CFR_3.343 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.343(a) and 3.344(a). Because the Court finds that the BVA disregarded the provisions of § 3.343(a) and § 3.443(a), under 38 U.S.C. § 7261 (a)(3) (formerly § 4061(a)(3)), we are compelled to reverse the BVA decision and remand the matter with a direction that appellant's former 100% rating be reinstated with an effective date of May 1, 1989. |