| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Home >> VA Claims Resources >> VA Claims >> VA General Counsel Precedent Opinions |
VA General Counsel Precedent Opinions |
|
Prec 15-99 Validity of Regulatory Provisions Precluding Service Connection of Polycythemia Vera Based on Exposure to Ionizing
|
Prec 15-99 Validity of Regulatory Provisions Precluding Service Connection of Polycythemia Vera Based on Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Citation: Vet. Aff. Op. Gen. Couns. Prec. 15-99, VAOPGCPREC 15-99, 1999 QUESTION PRESENTED: Are the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.311(b)(3) and (4) valid insofar as they appear to preclude claimants from establishing that polycythemia vera was incurred as the result of exposure to ionizing radiation in service? HELD: Paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of 38 C.F.R. § 3.311 are inconsistent with 38 U.S.C. § 1113(b) to the extent that those regulatory provisions purport to preclude a claimant from establishing by evidence that a particular veteran incurred polycythemia vera as the result of exposure to ionizing radiation in service. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may not rely upon 38 C.F.R. § 3.311(b)(3) and (4) as a basis for summarily denying any claim that polycythemia vera was incurred as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation in service. Rather, VA must give a claimant the opportunity to submit evidence to establish that a particular veteran incurred polycythemia vera as the result of exposure to ionizing radiation in service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|