• Announcements

    • How to get your questions answered.

      How to get your questions answered. A few observations, and requests of all members. All folks who come here are volunteers who do this on their own time and their own dime.To avoid burning out our best contributors please follow these guidelinesf you are reading a post and it reminds you of a question you want to ask, start a new topic, if you place your question in someone thread it will be difficult to distinguish your question from the original poster, you will get better results posting a new topic with your question. 1. Before Posting please do a search and see if your question has already been answered. If you find the answer print it out and put it in a file to use as a reference file, I find this helpful myself. 2. If you can not find the answer and you do post a question, please print out those answers and refer to them to avoid duplicate questions. 3. Refer to the Frequently Asked Questions4. Duplicate questions will come up from time to time but the keeping them to the minimum will lighten the load on the regular volunteers.5. Respect folks privacy do not request their personal phone numbers for claims help, it is inappropriate and not why they are here.6. Keep the topics focused on veterans issues, in closing Search first Search ... Ask second.it may save a lot of time or at the very least enlighten you.
    • Listen Live Every Wed 5:30 PM CST to SVR Radio, Veterans Issues are discussed with various guests.

      Listen Live Every Wed 5:30 PM CST to SVR Radio, Veterans Issues are discussed with various guests. Please check the little home I am carving out for our SVR partners. http://www.hadit.com/svr.html
    • A bit about Tbird and HadIt.com for those who've asked...

      The following is on my About page, but some have been asking how this all happened. So here is my little story. Tbird US Navy 1983 – 1990 E-6 HadIt.com the website domain registered Jan 20, 1997 the domain is registered and paid for through Jan 21, 2023 at which time I plan to register it for another 15 years Lord willing and the creek don't rise. I guess the best place to start is Jan 1991; I had gotten out of the navy Dec 1990. At my separation seminar, there was a DAV rep Jim Milton he told us to bring our medical records in and he would look through them for us and let us know if we should file a claim with the VA. Well, bless his heart, he opened my medical file, reads the first insert, looks me straight in the eye, and says you will be 50% for the rest of your life and he would file the claim for me. 50% was for surgery I had in the service. True to his word he met with me and talked with me for a long time filled out my paper work and urged me to file for PTSD. I would not file the PTSD claim, nor even discuss it. By Feb 1991 I had moved to the San Francisco bay area and was staying at a friends apartment and pretty much I was just a puddle. In desperation one night I called suicide hot line, I had no job, no idea about going to the VA. They talked with me for a long time and explained to me that I could go to the local VA hospital even if I did not have insurance. Now, I know what you are thinking if I was 50% why didn't I just go to the VA in the first place, two reasons 1, this was Feb 1991 and the 50% didn't come till May and 2, even if it had come through it is unlikely that I would have had the mental acuity at the time to put the two together. I relate this here because it is where so many of our brothers and sisters are coming from, perhaps where you started. Fuzzy and unsure, in pain and sometimes homeless they come to the VA hospital for help. And that is where I ended up. Up to the pysch ward I went, blah, blah, blah, a few days later I was released with a promise of a call from the out patient program, which I would soon be entering. Blah, blah, blah, after many missed communications, and no call backs I was at the Day Hospital everyday M-F. And this brothers and sisters is where I began to learn and formulate my plan for HadIt.com. Veterans, veterans everywhere…I spent a year in the day hospital and about another year at a sheltered workshop before I got back on my feet. So I just talked to veterans everyday waiting for appointments, waiting for prescriptions, waiting for a vet rep and I started to learn the system. While in the navy I was data analyst and had to learn a 5 volume manual and just about anything you were suppose to do was in that manual. So I figured there must be a manual on how to do a VA claim or at the very least regulations. So I found out about the Code of Federal Regulations, United States Code, Veterans Affairs Manuals and so on and so forth. Of course this was 1991/1992 I was living in a tiny studio apartment in a particularly bad neighborhood, working in a sheltered workshop making a nickel per envelope I stuffed throw in PTSD and you will see that it was a difficult task for me to get somewhere where they had copies of these, let alone that they would let me look at. And there was so much knowledge around me, it was like the gold rush in those days, I could just sit on a bench a veteran would sit down next to me a little conversation later I had another nugget, I made copious notes. Phone numbers to call, ask for this guy or that guy he'll give you the straight scoop and they'd slip me a piece of paper with a number on it. You want to read this regulation or that one and another slip of paper into my hand. I spent a lot of time on those benches watching the squirrels they gathered their nuts and I gathered mine :) So I'm thinking I could put a little handbook together print it out and hand it out at the VA. Or perhaps fliers. Still formulating, time goes by, 1994/1995 I am being treated for PTSD regularly and doing and feeling much better and I go to work for a company as a marketing systems analyst and I discover the internet. Well let me tell you that was perhaps one of the most significant life changing events I have ever experienced. And I might add finally a positive one :) It seemed only natural to me that surely there must be a website that contained all the knowledge I wanted, well as it turned out not so much, lots of stuff but I wanted to get straight to the claims information and there was a lot of stuff to wade through to get to it. So taking my lesson from the squirrels earlier I started to gather, gather, gather…and learn HTML and work as a marketing systems analyst and work my claim. 1996/1997 major PTSD cork blows and unemployed. Working my claim, working the website. 20 Jan 1997 register HadIt.com domain name right after getting off the phone with the VA and saying I've had it with this. As fate would have it the old DAV board goes down just as mine opens up and folks start to wander in. So HadIt.com has two main components the website which supports the discussion board with links, articles, research resources etc. The website starts to grow, I can't tell you how many times I had to switch servers for space and features. I continue on a downward trend and in 1998 ended up back home in St Louis living in my sisters basement in therapy and working it, I swear I would have swung a dead chicken around my head at midnight naked if I thought it would have helped. The website continued to do great during this time, I just stayed in the basement bought new software, new books, and learned how to make things work and I continued to use this knowledge to make HadIt.com better. My 100% finally came through from the VA and I had a friend who is an advocate who helped me thru my SSDI claim, he was literally at my side thru the entire process and that came through for me. My therapist and sister continued to try and get me to leave the basement, but to no avail. At some point in 1998 or 1999 I put a counter on the website and was shocked to discover how many visitors we were getting. Time goes by my sister gets married and I move from the basement to the upstairs, there is much celebration that Aunt T is living in the light again. More time goes by and I settle into my life in St Louis and spend more time on the site trying new things, finding more information. 2003 I buy my own home VA loan. For years now I have just considered HadIt.com my job and I get up every morning go to the office and work for several hours, take an afternoon break and see where the rest of day takes me. I have a place in the office to use the computer and a comfortable to place to read journals and articles and take notes. Blah, blah, blah so that is my story and HadIt.com's intertwined.
    • HadIt.com Pass It On Cards

      Hi I've updated our HadIt.com Pass It On Cards. They are in a PDF format you can print them out cut them there are 12 to a page. If you have found HadIt.com helpful and would like to pass it on to other veterans this is an easy way to do it.I hope you find them helpful, feel free to leave a few anywhere veterans gather, veterans centers, veterans hospitals, public libraries, be creative. Please make sure though, that if you want to leave some at any business you ask permission first.Here you go http://www.hadit.com...it_on_cards.pdf
    • VA Training and Fast Letter Forum Index

      VA Training and Fast Letter Forum Index The following is the index with links to the various Training and Fast Letters plus a few miscellaneous. These letters are not necessarily in the original formatting. I have tried to present them in an easy-to-read form instead of some forms as originally presented. Some of the paragraphs were WAAAAYYY too long. lol - HadIt.com Member fanaticbooks Something to be aware.... Some of these letters may be rescinded, outdated, or otherwise no longer viable. I have still included them because sometimes they provide additional insight or just plain more information than the newest version. Use them wisely. The oldest letters will display at the bottom with the latest letters displayed at the top, all in sequential numbers. Coding of the letters... FL = Fast Letter TL = Training Letter First two numbers = last two digits of year of origin Training Letter http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40694-va-tl-00-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40693-va-tl-00-06/ Fast Letter Number Title http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44262-va-fl-11-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44260-va-fl-11-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44261-va-fl-11-11/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44310-va-fl-11-09/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42151-va-fl-11-03/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40957-va-fl-10-49/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40958-va-fl-10-46/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40959-va-fl-10-45/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40960-va-fl-10-42/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40961-va-fl-10-39/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40962-va-fl-10-35/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40963-va-fl-10-34/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40964-va-fl-10-32/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40966-va-fl-10-30/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40967-va-fl-10-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40968-va-fl-10-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40819-va-fl-10-24e1/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40818-va-fl-10-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40817-va-fl-10-22/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40814-va-fl-10-04/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40969-va-fl-10-03/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40812-va-fl-10-02/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40808-va-fl-09-52/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40806-va-fl-09-50/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40970-va-fl-09-41/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40971-va-fl-09-38/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40804-va-fl-09-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40972-va-fl-09-28/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40671-va-fl-09-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40973-va-fl-09-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40803-va-fl-09-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40802-va-fl-09-21e2/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40801-va-fl-09-21/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40799-va-fl-09-20/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40798-va-fl-09-17/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40974-va-fl-09-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40975-va-fl-09-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40797-va-fl-09-10e1/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40796-va-fl-09-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40795-va-fl-09-09/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40976-va-fl-09-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40794-va-fl-09-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40793-va-fl-09-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40977-va-fl-09-05/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40731-va-fl-08-41/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40730-va-fl-08-38/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40729-va-fl-08-36/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40728-va-fl-08-34/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40726-va-fl-08-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40725-va-fl-08-31/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40978-va-fl-08-29/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40724-va-fl-08-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40723-va-fl-08-23/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40722-va-fl-08-20/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40979-va-fl-08-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40721-va-fl-08-12/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40720-va-fl-08-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40719-va-fl-08-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41580-va-fl-08-02/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40717-va-fl-07-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40980-va-fl-07-19/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40981-va-fl-07-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40718-va-fl-07-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40716-va-fl-07-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40715-va-fl-07-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40701-va-fl-07-01/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40983-va-fl-06-29/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40699-va-fl-06-28/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40984-va-fl-06-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41579-va-fl-06-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40698-va-fl-06-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40986-va-fl-06-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40987-va-fl-06-21/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40988-va-fl-06-19/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40696-va-fl-05-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40697-va-fl-04-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40989-va-fl-04-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42415-va-fl-02-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41582-va-fl-01-94/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40990-va-fl-00-44/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41581-va-fl-00-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40991-va-fl-99-124/ Miscellaneous http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40993-best-practice-manual-for-posttraumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44264-auditory-noise-fsh-regulation-no-40-7-appendix-b/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44266-auditory-noise-duty-mosjob-title/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44265-auditory-noise-cam-regulation-40-5/ VHA Directives Number Title http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41073-va-vha-directive-2010-045/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42174-vha-directive-2010-033/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42175-vha-directive-2010-029/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42176-vha-directive-2010-014/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42177-vha-directive-2010-012/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42178-vha-directive-2010-009/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42179-vha-directive-2009-048/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42180-vha-directive-2009-047/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42150-vha-directive-2008-071/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42181-vha-directive-2008-070/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44263-vha-directive-2008-005/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42182-vha-directive-2007-039/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42183-vha-directive-2007-024/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42184-vha-directive-2007-016/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42185-vha-directive-2007-013/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42186-vha-directive-2006-057/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40994-va-vha-directive-2006-013/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42187-vha-directive-2000-029/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • 0

Benefit Of The Doubt Rule Must Be Applied

Question

Posted

38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b).

Section 5107(b) expressly provides that the benefit of the doubt rule must be applied to a claim when the evidence submitted in support of the claim is in relative equipoise. The evidence is in relative equipoise when there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence which does not satisfactorily prove or disprove the claim. When the evidence is in relative equipoise, the reasonable doubt rule must be applied to the claim, and thus, the claim must be resolved in favor of the claimant. See Massey v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 204, 206-207 (1994); Hayes v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 60, 69-70 (1993); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 53-56 (1990).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 answers to this question

Posted

This regulation is the essence of the claims process.It is a Basic right as well as a regulation.

It always bears repeating how this works.

The evidence for the claim does not have to be overwhelming or in a "preponderance" in VA lingo--just enough to weigh the scales equally.

But VA owns the scale.

This is why the new PTSD regs have been challenged by a CAVC petition by numerous lawyers-

the new PTSD regs prohibit an independent medical opinion to support a PTSD diagnosis.

Any veteran coming under the new PTSD rules ,who VA will NOT diagnose with PTSD, is left without the ability to use this basic tenet of VA case law- 38 USC 5107 (b) in order to provide an IMO.

Thanks Carlie -this is important for all newbies to read and it goes for widows /widowers claims too.

Most claims are awarded under principles of Relative Equipoise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites






Posted

This regulation is the essence of the claims process.It is a Basic right as well as a regulation.

It always bears repeating how this works.

The evidence for the claim does not have to be overwhelming or in a "preponderance" in VA lingo--just enough to weigh the scales equally.

But VA owns the scale.

This is why the new PTSD regs have been challenged by a CAVC petition by numerous lawyers-

the new PTSD regs prohibit an independent medical opinion to support a PTSD diagnosis.

Any veteran coming under the new PTSD rules ,who VA will NOT diagnose with PTSD, is left without the ability to use this basic tenet of VA case law- 38 USC 5107 (b) in order to provide an IMO.

Thanks Carlie -this is important for all newbies to read and it goes for widows /widowers claims too.

Most claims are awarded under principles of Relative Equipoise.

Berta,

The VA has no problem diagnosing my PTSD, they just don't want to pay for it. If the CAVC judge finds in my favor, it may overturn the roadblocks for a lot of vets.

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"The VA has no problem diagnosing my PTSD, they just don't want to pay for it. If the CAVC judge finds in my favor, it may overturn the roadblocks for a lot of vets."

Have they questioned your stressor???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I checked out your older posts Mike:

Posted 09 December 2008 - 02:37 PM

"Update, I sent got a copy of the JSRRC Verification of stressors that was sent to the VA. It only half verifies what was requested. The other parts they tell the VA that I need to provide the information.

So today I sent express mail/Certified a package to the AMC with everything and a cover letter explaining what it was. Hopefully they add it to the rest. I have included Military orders, copies of pictures, copies of LES's, copies of Medals statements,copies of certificates, Letters from Senior Officers, and write ups, copies of the manifest that were used for the medals. Just for fun I added my own research including a copy of the court records of an officer that was court martialed that explains the situation, as well as expedia, and other assorted articles. I hope they at least look at it. My situation was unorthodox, but well documented on my end."

Obviously you did a lot of leg work.

Has the VA acknowledged in any way that they have these documents?

The bad thing about the CAVC is that they do not consider new evidence and focus on what VA has in the record and they primarily look for any legal errors on BVA's part that were detrimental to the claim.

However if you have a lawyer who will fight for a joint remand this can open the door for new evidence or for old evidence they have still failed to acknowledge.

When VA diagnosed your PTSD what did they attribute it to-with full medical rationale if not the stressor you claimed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The VA's interpretation of the "benefit of the doubt" regulation:

They "Doubt" the Veteran is going to get any "benefits".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I checked out your older posts Mike:

Posted 09 December 2008 - 02:37 PM

"Update, I sent got a copy of the JSRRC Verification of stressors that was sent to the VA. It only half verifies what was requested. The other parts they tell the VA that I need to provide the information.

So today I sent express mail/Certified a package to the AMC with everything and a cover letter explaining what it was. Hopefully they add it to the rest. I have included Military orders, copies of pictures, copies of LES's, copies of Medals statements,copies of certificates, Letters from Senior Officers, and write ups, copies of the manifest that were used for the medals. Just for fun I added my own research including a copy of the court records of an officer that was court martialed that explains the situation, as well as expedia, and other assorted articles. I hope they at least look at it. My situation was unorthodox, but well documented on my end."

Obviously you did a lot of leg work.

Has the VA acknowledged in any way that they have these documents?

The bad thing about the CAVC is that they do not consider new evidence and focus on what VA has in the record and they primarily look for any legal errors on BVA's part that were detrimental to the claim.

However if you have a lawyer who will fight for a joint remand this can open the door for new evidence or for old evidence they have still failed to acknowledge.

When VA diagnosed your PTSD what did they attribute it to-with full medical rationale if not the stressor you claimed?

I have a lawyer. He gets very angry with the VA and I have had to talk him down a couple of times. (The Meds are working) The VA diagnosed me with PTSD and the answer kept coming back that they cannot prove my stressors. This package is everything they have. They conveniently ignore a lot of my evidence. The Doctor was very concerned that I seek help and pronto, the VA docs have no doubt and at the time gave me a GAF of 45, which I am not proud of. Some of the stuff I have dealt with is still Classified TS, so I really cannot discuss them with anyone. I had one psychologist that dropped me as a client as my "issues" were giving him nightmares. So even talking about the things I can discuss is rather futile. I am with Chisholm, Chisholm, and Kilpatrick. So far they have been most helpful. In fact much of my case is based on what I have written to the VA. If it was not for the Meds I am pretty sure I would not be working right now, but I doubt that not having something to occupy my time would be of much help to me. I don't care if they give me a 0% rating on this. I just want them to admit it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Every time I read about giving us the benefit of the doubt I laugh.

I was one of the PTSD vets who had to be humiliated by going through every detail I could remember about my combat time to "verify" I was there. Pictures, awards, medals etc. weren't good enough just a couple of years ago.

Today I am still waiting on an EED claim from 1994 and even though the last DRO said I tried to do everything right and VA dropped the ball multiple times (I wont bore anyone with details) I got a call from my rep last week suggesting that I not only remove my request for another DRO review but that I should also switch from a teleconference to a travel board as "everyone here at the RO (Buffalo) agrees with you, they just feel that they don't have the authority to approve the claim".

So it gets kicked up to BVA who will probably remand it back to Buffalo and I wait and wait and wait. All over $15000 or so in back pay. If nobody at the RO level can approve that then it is no wonder orders to give us the benefit of the doubt are ignored. Nobody wants to dare get their #$%& slapped for "giving away" money.

Sad.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"I got a call from my rep last week suggesting that I not only remove my request for another DRO review but that I should also switch from a teleconference to a travel board as "everyone here at the RO (Buffalo) agrees with you, they just feel that they don't have the authority to approve the claim"."

Yeah right - I hope he isn't one of my former reps at Buffalo-

His idea would certainly string the claim out even more.

Quint you probably know the BVA awarded my AO death claim last year. The decision even states that Buffalo had multiple copies of 3 IMos and other evidence that they ignored for years.

Buffalo sent me the award letter and I actually got 3 because I questioned each one they sent- I was ready to send them another letter but the IHD regs came into play-and luckily my IHD claim went to the Nehmer people in Phila VARO.And that will resolve my issues I hope.

Buffalo refused to refund my FTCA offset.

I had to go not only over their head but over the Regional Counsel in Buffalo's head.

I got my money. Almost a year after my award- disgraceful.

You might consider preparing a letter for the OGC. Call them first to see who would be best staff attorney to direct it to.

Mike Daugherty used to handle claims questions.You can tell him I gave him your name for direction here but I think he might now have a different MOS with the OGC.

"everyone here at the RO (Buffalo) agrees with you, they just feel that they don't have the authority to approve the claim".

Is this statement documented by the VA?

There are individuals at Buffalo who are completely unable to make a decision that might cost VA some cash.That is why they ignored the regs that I sent to support my offset refund.

OGC didnt ignore them and ordered them to pay me.

If the RO doesnt have the authority to grant the claim-but they are agreeing with the claim- then you need to find someone who has authority and who can read at the VA.Their lawyers might be able to help.

Office of General COunsel 1-202=461-4900

Fax 1=202=273-6385

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks Berta. Yep Buffalo is Buffalo. I talked to my rep there (who has finally agreed that my rep here does nothing so he is willing to talk directly instead of saying "call your rep in Rochester) and he used those words about his conversations with the DRO. I brought up that VARO has to have someone that can approve it and he said everyone there wants a judge to decide it. Ugh. He did say he would submit a request for a "statement of the case" which should list all reasons for/against in it and should be useful during the travel board. That is supposed to take less than a month he said.

I listened to Tammy Duckworth on NPR a week or two ago and she is so disconnected with reality it is sad. And I say that not as a knock against her, but she said flat out that VA changed to always give vets the benefit of the doubt or as she said the baserunner gets the call when there is a tie just like in baseball. Sure........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The BOD is only for application when the evidence is in relative equipoise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe they will commit a CUE in the SOC.

The dream of my life is to get the VAOIG into Buffalo VARO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks Berta. Yep Buffalo is Buffalo. I talked to my rep there (who has finally agreed that my rep here does nothing so he is willing to talk directly instead of saying "call your rep in Rochester) and he used those words about his conversations with the DRO. I brought up that VARO has to have someone that can approve it and he said everyone there wants a judge to decide it. Ugh. He did say he would submit a request for a "statement of the case" which should list all reasons for/against in it and should be useful during the travel board. That is supposed to take less than a month he said.

I listened to Tammy Duckworth on NPR a week or two ago and she is so disconnected with reality it is sad. And I say that not as a knock against her, but she said flat out that VA changed to always give vets the benefit of the doubt or as she said the baserunner gets the call when there is a tie just like in baseball. Sure........

how and who could prove that any rule of doubt was applied correctly? rhetorical...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

how and who could prove that any rule of doubt was applied correctly? rhetorical...

retired,

Actually when reviewing all the evidence of record it would be quite

easy to prove. It could be done by a VSR,VSO,DRO,Judge etc....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Carlos, my evidence is tipped my way by well over half. My claim involves failure to notify me of decisions, failure to notify me of exams, failure of VA employees to follow their own rules about these notifications, etc.

My rep made it pretty clear that it comes down to nobody at the VARO being willing to put their own ne k on the line when "a judge can make that ruling". I even included the recent Fast Letter about how VA employees are denying claims due to failure to appear when the reason the vet was a no show was because VA screwed up. That massive document (it was some 50+ pages) states in it that VAROs can and should correct these.

VAs biggest problem is that they don't follow their own rules or guidelines. But everyone here knows that already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Sorry Carlie, my stupid new phone has auto correct and seems to think Carlos is what I meant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Today I am still waiting on an EED claim from 1994 and even though the last DRO said I tried to do everything right and VA dropped the ball multiple times (I wont bore anyone with details)

Quint,

It may have been just lip service because if the DRO truly felt this way, the DRO has fully authority to grant what ever was in question

and that would have been the end of it right then and there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Carlos, my evidence is tipped my way by well over half. My claim involves failure to notify me of decisions, failure to notify me of exams, failure of VA employees to follow their own rules about these notifications, etc.

My rep made it pretty clear that it comes down to nobody at the VARO being willing to put their own ne k on the line when "a judge can make that ruling". I even included the recent Fast Letter about how VA employees are denying claims due to failure to appear when the reason the vet was a no show was because VA screwed up. That massive document (it was some 50+ pages) states in it that VAROs can and should correct these.

VAs biggest problem is that they don't follow their own rules or guidelines. But everyone here knows that already.

This seems more like due process and duty to assist issues versus relative equipoise

and benefit of the doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

shouldn't this benefit of doubt rule apply when the C+P examiner states that a condition is :

at least as likely as not due to service -connection.

I had a claim denied despite this , now long wait for BVA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

shouldn't this benefit of doubt rule apply when the C+P examiner states that a condition is :

at least as likely as not due to service -connection.

I had a claim denied despite this , now long wait for BVA.

mrp,

Start a new topic with your question in the Claims Benefits Forum.

Post the exact wording from the Reasons and Bases Section for the denial.

But to answer your question - no that alone does even begin to put the

evidence of record into relative equipoise - which is REQUIRED in order

for the application of the BOD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I believe that we often lose sight of the actual wording of 38 U.S.C 5107, which includes:

"When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter, the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant." (My emphasis)

BOD doesn't just come into play at the end when a claim is award or denied; it is also supposed to be applied during all of the smaller decisions on individual pieces of evidence a rater makes leading up to the award or denial of a claim. The operative word is "any."

The ultimate award or denial of a claim is based on all of those individual smaller decisions. If the veteran was not afforded BOD on the preliminary decisions during adjudication, the veteran's evidence may never be viewed as being balanced between positive and negative when it actually is.

It almost goes without saying that if, as we see so often here on hadit, the veteran's evidence is completely ignored, then the veteran has suffered two distinct violations of the due process rights contained in 5107.

I agree wholeheartedly with Berta, Carlie, and others that the new PTSD regulations violate veterans' rights to due process. Hopefully, the court will agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"shouldn't this benefit of doubt rule apply when the C+P examiner states that a condition is :

at least as likely as not due to service -connection.

I had a claim denied despite this , now long wait for BVA."

MRP - can you scan and post the denial and attach here (cover Personal info)as to their Reasons and Bases?

Although the C & P doc said the magic words- as Carlie said-there is usually more to it then that- was it a question of no stressor verification?

Did the VA have medical records that contradicted the C & P findings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

thanks for you time to try to help me.

I will need some assistance to try to scan.

They posted the words of the C+P examiner which seemed supportive to me, especially since the issue seemed to be a medical opinion--

but denied by stating that my condition was "diagnosed" and not "undiagnosed illnesses" which would

qualify as presumptive due to Gulf War. I have Neuropathy which is Idiopathic ( that is , no known cause despite extensive testing).

I had a VA neurologist state that it could be due to exposure in Gulf War, and also had the statement from the C+P examiner -at least as likely as not.

I feel that the rater was making a medical opinion which was counter to the examiner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We have a lot of info here in the GWV forum.

It has to be a "qualifying chronic disability" to include undiagnosed illnesses.

Did a rep help you ? Didn't the rep present the claim right?

We did some SVR shows available here too as to GWV claims.

And there is I believe a recent fast letter on them.

VA does not recognize Gulf War Syndrome as a disability it itself- what they recognize as GW illnesses can be confusing.

It pays to read over the regs very carefully to make sure the claim fits into their criteria.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I did use a rep ( state VSO). I have learned alot reading the GWV forum as well as the others.

The VSO said to me, and in writing in the appeal, that they just didn't understand why it was denied.

I believe that the raters were confused about the GWI criteria. I even used a copy of the recent Training Letter ( 10-01)

to show that I met criteria, since this seemed to clarify what they missed the first time. It really came down to a medical opinion,

and it just seems that the medical opinion was completely ignored. It is now pending BVA. I suspect it will prevail , but someday in the far away future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The regulations contradict each other. As was pointed out, the regulations state the BOD is applied on "ANY" material issue, but, this is contradicted, because, for, example, BOD does not apply to CUE, and it also does not apply to establish eligibility. There, a much higher standard applies, "preponderance of evidence". In Cue, there is no "benefit of the doubt" but, instead, it has to be "undebateable".

As a result, the VA can often justify their decision either way.

On a more practical matter, however, there is a clear cut "pecking order" in the VA as there was in the military. We called it a "chain of command". There is not much doubt in my mind that "lower level" rating specialists do not want to "stick their neck out" and approve a large retro. Remember a large retro is essentially an admission of error. Why else could it possibly take, say, 10 years to process a claim (for a large retro)? There HAD to be errors or it would have been approved years ago.

So, does a rookie rating specialist want to risk his job by approving a large retro, when one of his peers has already denied it earlier? I dont think so. Even if they are a senior DRO rater, they are unlikely to "go against" their peers to approve a large retro that one of the others has already denied. For this reason, I think it is probably productive to "skip" the DRO review in large retros, and instead send it "uphill" to the BVA judge. The BVA judge has the undisputed authority to overturn DRO and rating specialists, and will do so if he feel it is justified.

Of course, the "hampster wheel" remand at the BVA creates a problem, where the BVA judge remands it to the RO, the ro denies, the Veteran appeals, the BVA remands it again, etc. The only way to get it off that hampster wheel is to:

1. Appeal the BVA remand and send it to the CAVC.

2. Try to make your claim "remand proof". This will take lots of preperation and research. You will have to find out what instances are remanded, find out which ones are not, and not leave your claim to chance about remand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites












  • HadIt.com Twitter