Jump to content



Search



Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:54 PM) Tbird Accepted To 2015 Conference: V-Wise: Another Entrepreneurship Project Of The Whitman School Of Management Http://ow.ly/ej9Qg
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:13 PM) Arng11 Thank You For Your Contribution To Our Funding Campaign.
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 02:57 PM) Thank You Ms T For Starting This Web Site For All Veterans, You Helpd Me And My Family And I'll Be Forever Gratful To You & Hadit.com
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:19 AM) Thank You All For Helping With The Funding The Site. It Is Really Helping!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:18 AM) Britton Pm Me And I. Can Check This Out For You
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 06:44 AM) What Does ''you Missed Your Quota For Postives Votes Today'' Mean??
@  coriemboh : (19 November 2014 - 08:29 AM) Hold Time For Peggy Was Approximately 1 Minute. That Was 17 Minutes Ago. They Really Need To Change This Hold Music.
@  Tbird : (17 November 2014 - 02:42 PM) Stretch Thanks For The Extra Contribution To Our Fundraiser This Month.
@  maxwell18 : (16 November 2014 - 09:04 PM) I Still Have To Bitch About The Navy Hosp Cutting My Meds By 2/3 On My Norco. I Contacted Customer Service Or What Ever You Want To Call It Who In Turn Contacted The Navy Hosp Pensacola Commander Who In Turn Did Nothing. Thanks To All The People That Are Affair Of There Jobs And I Feel That Medical Malpractice Should Come Into Place. I Guess Just Do What Ever They Want To Because They Can, But Don't Give A Sh T For The Vets That Suppose To Being Supporting From All The Military  organizations. This Is Not The Way They Have Been Trained And Promised To Do. 
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:26 AM) Delayed Onset Tinnitus - Ref To Va Training Letter 10-028 - Link - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/single-Judge-Application-Va-Training-Letter-10-028-Delayed-Onset-Tinnitus/
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:03 AM) Here's A Good Tinnitus Link To Check Out From M21-1 Change Dated Jan 10,2014 - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/tag/section-B-Duty-Military-Occupational-Specialty-Mos-Noise-Exposure-Listing-Fast-Letter-10-35-Tinnitus-Hearing-Loss-Vbms-Rating-Decision-Tools/
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:08 AM) "rolled" Not Ruled! :)
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:07 AM) Thanks. I Have Seen The Fast Ltr 10-35 And Have Seen Cases Where The Va Has Apparently Agreed That Tinnitus Can Have Delayed Onset. I Did Not In Looking Over The Fast Ltr See Where They Had Ruled 10-028 Into That. And, I Am Not Sure In The Vas Issuance Of ‘policy’ Type Letters How They Might Roll In Previous Instructions Into Newer Ones. Maybe There Is Some Intranet Traceability Capability? I Was Just Curious As There ‘appeared’ To Be Conspicuous Absence Of That 10-028. I Am Assuming 10-028 Was Written In 2010. But It May Be I Should Not Assume Anything.
@  carlie : (15 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Asiadaug - You Might Be Looking For Fast Letter 10-35, Http://www.hadit.com/forums/topic/40962-Va-Fl-10-35/ Also Check Out This Link To Links For Delayed Onset Tinnitus - They All Refer Back To Fast Letter 10-35, Https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=Chrome-Instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=Utf-8#q=Tinnitus, Delayed Onset, Va Fast Letter
@  Tbird : (15 November 2014 - 07:50 AM) Asiadaug Searched All Over For Va Training Letter 10-028 But No Luck So Far.
@  Asiadaug : (15 November 2014 - 02:12 AM) Several Cases I've Run Across Mention Va Training Letter 10-028 With Apparent Discussion About Delayed Onset Of Tinnitus. I Have Been Unable To Locate That Trng Ltr. Any Suggestions?
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Stretch Thanks For Contributing To Our Fundraising Campairg
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 04:01 AM) Atomicwidow Thank Your For Donating To Our Funding Campaign.
@  Tbird : (11 November 2014 - 07:00 AM) Veterans Day 2014 - Veterans Thank You For Your Service And Your Sacrifice.
@  Tbird : (10 November 2014 - 07:19 AM) Semper Fi Marines

Photo

Would This Be A Cue


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 twresamarie

 
twresamarie

    E-2 Recruit

  • Seaman
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
 

Posted 18 June 2011 - 11:30 PM

so i now have everything rite infront of me
dec 07
filed for increase for back/knee/ and IU
aug 08
they increased the back and knee, IU denied b/c you have not been found unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of s/c disabilities. was only increase to a total of 60%. (40 back, knee 20) they didn't grant extra-schedular (i think b/c only 2yrs out of work, and 8m out of school chp 31 at that time)
oct 08
filed for secondary s/c for hip and other knee strains
oct 09
granted using c&p exam feb 09 (hip/knee) doc suggested using a cain. now met schedular, no earned income, no school.
oct 09
filed for just IU
apr 10
denied: but they say 'REMAINS' denied. my claim for IU was considered REOPENED. but denied b/c the evidence does not show "the the claiment is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation as a result of s/c dis."
(i dont think this makes sense)they go on to say
you meet the schedulat req. for this benefit but the evidence of record doesn't show (same as above)
:EVIDENCE:
notification from SSA dated apr 10
misc medical treatment reports submitted by me from aug 05 to jan 07 (remember this was denied once again in 2009_lol)
my fm 21-8940 oct 09
rating decision oct 09 (WTF)
apr 11
filed NOD with copy of the form my CPC filled out for SSDI, now aint that funny...lol
jun 11
"we received your appeal election form indication anotice of disagreement for back condition, (say what) the records show the VA rating dated aug 08 and the notification of this decision was mailed aug 08. you have one year from the date of mailing the notification of the decision to appeal. when the time limits expire, the decision becomes final. (duh) No further action will be taken on this appeal.
so where in the hell did my back come into this is what i am wondering.

what is going on with these people?
does anyone have a clue
letter gen. on ebenefits, shows new amount (correct with IU) but same %. will this stay as is. dated for the day after my child was born.

#2 Berta

 
Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29022 posts
 

Posted 19 June 2011 - 07:27 AM

Do you rceiuve SSDI solely for the service connected conditions?

If so does the VA know that?

Did your SC disabilities make it difficult for you to continue Chapter 31?

If so do you have documentation on that?

Are you able to scan and attach here the denial (cover the c file # and personal identifying stuff)

"letter gen. on ebenefits, shows new amount (correct with IU) but same %. will this stay as is. dated for the day after my child was born"


Do you get or expect to receive soon the amount of 100% comp? I am confused here but others will chime in.

This is not a CUE.

Something does seem wrong here. Do you have a vet rep?

#3 twresamarie

 
twresamarie

    E-2 Recruit

  • Seaman
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
 

Posted 19 June 2011 - 09:34 AM

[quote name='Berta' timestamp='1308490055' post='248531']
Do you rceiuve SSDI solely for the service connected conditions?
the same thing happened with SSDI, denied w/in two months

If so does the VA know that?
i dont think so, they do know that i was seeking out side evidence

Did your SC disabilities make it difficult for you to continue Chapter 31?
i have a paper from chp 31 stating that i was dropped from the program due to medical reasons

If so do you have documentation on that?
yes i do

Are you able to scan and attach here the denial (cover the c file # and personal identifying stuff)
no, do not even have a printer

"letter gen. on ebenefits, shows new amount (correct with IU) but same %. will this stay as is. dated for the day after my child was born"


Do you get or expect to receive soon the amount of 100% comp? I am confused here but others will chime in.
i have read that a DRO can not close out the case w/o granting in ful, so the % was the same but the comp amount had increased to the 100%

This is not a CUE.
i thought it would be, due to the fact that they are now denying a increace in my s/c back contion from 08, and not the IU

Something does seem wrong here. Do you have a vet rep?
i do have an American Leg. rep an will speek to him in the morning.
if you need more info i can provide any thing that was writen word for word. i am at a lose as to what this means. but i do think they are trying to save money and not have to retro back to the date i first applied for IU. I turned in one new piece of evidence in 11 nothing else was turned in since 09.
any thoughts

#4 john999

 
john999

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22329 posts
 

Posted 19 June 2011 - 11:11 AM

As long as your claim is not final it can't be a CUE. You don't want it to be a CUE if you can help it.

#5 Philip Rogers

 
Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3974 posts
 

Posted 19 June 2011 - 04:39 PM

I can't decipher your post. As I see it you failed to NOD the decisions, you just kept adding new claims????

pr