• Announcements

    • How to get your questions answered.

      How to get your questions answered. A few observations, and requests of all members. All folks who come here are volunteers who do this on their own time and their own dime.To avoid burning out our best contributors please follow these guidelinesf you are reading a post and it reminds you of a question you want to ask, start a new topic, if you place your question in someone thread it will be difficult to distinguish your question from the original poster, you will get better results posting a new topic with your question. 1. Before Posting please do a search and see if your question has already been answered. If you find the answer print it out and put it in a file to use as a reference file, I find this helpful myself. 2. If you can not find the answer and you do post a question, please print out those answers and refer to them to avoid duplicate questions. 3. Refer to the Frequently Asked Questions4. Duplicate questions will come up from time to time but the keeping them to the minimum will lighten the load on the regular volunteers.5. Respect folks privacy do not request their personal phone numbers for claims help, it is inappropriate and not why they are here.6. Keep the topics focused on veterans issues, in closing Search first Search ... Ask second.it may save a lot of time or at the very least enlighten you.
    • Listen Live Every Wed 5:30 PM CST to SVR Radio, Veterans Issues are discussed with various guests.

      Listen Live Every Wed 5:30 PM CST to SVR Radio, Veterans Issues are discussed with various guests. Please check the little home I am carving out for our SVR partners. http://www.hadit.com/svr.html
    • A bit about Tbird and HadIt.com for those who've asked...

      The following is on my About page, but some have been asking how this all happened. So here is my little story. Tbird US Navy 1983 – 1990 E-6 HadIt.com the website domain registered Jan 20, 1997 the domain is registered and paid for through Jan 21, 2023 at which time I plan to register it for another 15 years Lord willing and the creek don't rise. I guess the best place to start is Jan 1991; I had gotten out of the navy Dec 1990. At my separation seminar, there was a DAV rep Jim Milton he told us to bring our medical records in and he would look through them for us and let us know if we should file a claim with the VA. Well, bless his heart, he opened my medical file, reads the first insert, looks me straight in the eye, and says you will be 50% for the rest of your life and he would file the claim for me. 50% was for surgery I had in the service. True to his word he met with me and talked with me for a long time filled out my paper work and urged me to file for PTSD. I would not file the PTSD claim, nor even discuss it. By Feb 1991 I had moved to the San Francisco bay area and was staying at a friends apartment and pretty much I was just a puddle. In desperation one night I called suicide hot line, I had no job, no idea about going to the VA. They talked with me for a long time and explained to me that I could go to the local VA hospital even if I did not have insurance. Now, I know what you are thinking if I was 50% why didn't I just go to the VA in the first place, two reasons 1, this was Feb 1991 and the 50% didn't come till May and 2, even if it had come through it is unlikely that I would have had the mental acuity at the time to put the two together. I relate this here because it is where so many of our brothers and sisters are coming from, perhaps where you started. Fuzzy and unsure, in pain and sometimes homeless they come to the VA hospital for help. And that is where I ended up. Up to the pysch ward I went, blah, blah, blah, a few days later I was released with a promise of a call from the out patient program, which I would soon be entering. Blah, blah, blah, after many missed communications, and no call backs I was at the Day Hospital everyday M-F. And this brothers and sisters is where I began to learn and formulate my plan for HadIt.com. Veterans, veterans everywhere…I spent a year in the day hospital and about another year at a sheltered workshop before I got back on my feet. So I just talked to veterans everyday waiting for appointments, waiting for prescriptions, waiting for a vet rep and I started to learn the system. While in the navy I was data analyst and had to learn a 5 volume manual and just about anything you were suppose to do was in that manual. So I figured there must be a manual on how to do a VA claim or at the very least regulations. So I found out about the Code of Federal Regulations, United States Code, Veterans Affairs Manuals and so on and so forth. Of course this was 1991/1992 I was living in a tiny studio apartment in a particularly bad neighborhood, working in a sheltered workshop making a nickel per envelope I stuffed throw in PTSD and you will see that it was a difficult task for me to get somewhere where they had copies of these, let alone that they would let me look at. And there was so much knowledge around me, it was like the gold rush in those days, I could just sit on a bench a veteran would sit down next to me a little conversation later I had another nugget, I made copious notes. Phone numbers to call, ask for this guy or that guy he'll give you the straight scoop and they'd slip me a piece of paper with a number on it. You want to read this regulation or that one and another slip of paper into my hand. I spent a lot of time on those benches watching the squirrels they gathered their nuts and I gathered mine :) So I'm thinking I could put a little handbook together print it out and hand it out at the VA. Or perhaps fliers. Still formulating, time goes by, 1994/1995 I am being treated for PTSD regularly and doing and feeling much better and I go to work for a company as a marketing systems analyst and I discover the internet. Well let me tell you that was perhaps one of the most significant life changing events I have ever experienced. And I might add finally a positive one :) It seemed only natural to me that surely there must be a website that contained all the knowledge I wanted, well as it turned out not so much, lots of stuff but I wanted to get straight to the claims information and there was a lot of stuff to wade through to get to it. So taking my lesson from the squirrels earlier I started to gather, gather, gather…and learn HTML and work as a marketing systems analyst and work my claim. 1996/1997 major PTSD cork blows and unemployed. Working my claim, working the website. 20 Jan 1997 register HadIt.com domain name right after getting off the phone with the VA and saying I've had it with this. As fate would have it the old DAV board goes down just as mine opens up and folks start to wander in. So HadIt.com has two main components the website which supports the discussion board with links, articles, research resources etc. The website starts to grow, I can't tell you how many times I had to switch servers for space and features. I continue on a downward trend and in 1998 ended up back home in St Louis living in my sisters basement in therapy and working it, I swear I would have swung a dead chicken around my head at midnight naked if I thought it would have helped. The website continued to do great during this time, I just stayed in the basement bought new software, new books, and learned how to make things work and I continued to use this knowledge to make HadIt.com better. My 100% finally came through from the VA and I had a friend who is an advocate who helped me thru my SSDI claim, he was literally at my side thru the entire process and that came through for me. My therapist and sister continued to try and get me to leave the basement, but to no avail. At some point in 1998 or 1999 I put a counter on the website and was shocked to discover how many visitors we were getting. Time goes by my sister gets married and I move from the basement to the upstairs, there is much celebration that Aunt T is living in the light again. More time goes by and I settle into my life in St Louis and spend more time on the site trying new things, finding more information. 2003 I buy my own home VA loan. For years now I have just considered HadIt.com my job and I get up every morning go to the office and work for several hours, take an afternoon break and see where the rest of day takes me. I have a place in the office to use the computer and a comfortable to place to read journals and articles and take notes. Blah, blah, blah so that is my story and HadIt.com's intertwined.
    • HadIt.com Pass It On Cards

      Hi I've updated our HadIt.com Pass It On Cards. They are in a PDF format you can print them out cut them there are 12 to a page. If you have found HadIt.com helpful and would like to pass it on to other veterans this is an easy way to do it.I hope you find them helpful, feel free to leave a few anywhere veterans gather, veterans centers, veterans hospitals, public libraries, be creative. Please make sure though, that if you want to leave some at any business you ask permission first.Here you go http://www.hadit.com...it_on_cards.pdf
    • VA Training and Fast Letter Forum Index

      VA Training and Fast Letter Forum Index The following is the index with links to the various Training and Fast Letters plus a few miscellaneous. These letters are not necessarily in the original formatting. I have tried to present them in an easy-to-read form instead of some forms as originally presented. Some of the paragraphs were WAAAAYYY too long. lol - HadIt.com Member fanaticbooks Something to be aware.... Some of these letters may be rescinded, outdated, or otherwise no longer viable. I have still included them because sometimes they provide additional insight or just plain more information than the newest version. Use them wisely. The oldest letters will display at the bottom with the latest letters displayed at the top, all in sequential numbers. Coding of the letters... FL = Fast Letter TL = Training Letter First two numbers = last two digits of year of origin Training Letter http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40694-va-tl-00-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40693-va-tl-00-06/ Fast Letter Number Title http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44262-va-fl-11-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44260-va-fl-11-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44261-va-fl-11-11/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44310-va-fl-11-09/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42151-va-fl-11-03/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40957-va-fl-10-49/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40958-va-fl-10-46/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40959-va-fl-10-45/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40960-va-fl-10-42/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40961-va-fl-10-39/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40962-va-fl-10-35/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40963-va-fl-10-34/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40964-va-fl-10-32/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40966-va-fl-10-30/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40967-va-fl-10-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40968-va-fl-10-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40819-va-fl-10-24e1/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40818-va-fl-10-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40817-va-fl-10-22/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40814-va-fl-10-04/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40969-va-fl-10-03/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40812-va-fl-10-02/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40808-va-fl-09-52/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40806-va-fl-09-50/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40970-va-fl-09-41/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40971-va-fl-09-38/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40804-va-fl-09-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40972-va-fl-09-28/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40671-va-fl-09-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40973-va-fl-09-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40803-va-fl-09-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40802-va-fl-09-21e2/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40801-va-fl-09-21/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40799-va-fl-09-20/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40798-va-fl-09-17/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40974-va-fl-09-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40975-va-fl-09-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40797-va-fl-09-10e1/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40796-va-fl-09-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40795-va-fl-09-09/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40976-va-fl-09-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40794-va-fl-09-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40793-va-fl-09-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40977-va-fl-09-05/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40731-va-fl-08-41/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40730-va-fl-08-38/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40729-va-fl-08-36/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40728-va-fl-08-34/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40726-va-fl-08-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40725-va-fl-08-31/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40978-va-fl-08-29/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40724-va-fl-08-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40723-va-fl-08-23/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40722-va-fl-08-20/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40979-va-fl-08-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40721-va-fl-08-12/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40720-va-fl-08-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40719-va-fl-08-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41580-va-fl-08-02/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40717-va-fl-07-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40980-va-fl-07-19/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40981-va-fl-07-15/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40718-va-fl-07-10/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40716-va-fl-07-07/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40715-va-fl-07-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40701-va-fl-07-01/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40983-va-fl-06-29/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40699-va-fl-06-28/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40984-va-fl-06-27/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41579-va-fl-06-26/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40698-va-fl-06-25/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40986-va-fl-06-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40987-va-fl-06-21/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40988-va-fl-06-19/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40696-va-fl-05-08/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40697-va-fl-04-13/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40989-va-fl-04-06/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42415-va-fl-02-24/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41582-va-fl-01-94/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40990-va-fl-00-44/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41581-va-fl-00-33/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40991-va-fl-99-124/ Miscellaneous http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40993-best-practice-manual-for-posttraumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44264-auditory-noise-fsh-regulation-no-40-7-appendix-b/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44266-auditory-noise-duty-mosjob-title/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44265-auditory-noise-cam-regulation-40-5/ VHA Directives Number Title http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/41073-va-vha-directive-2010-045/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42174-vha-directive-2010-033/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42175-vha-directive-2010-029/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42176-vha-directive-2010-014/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42177-vha-directive-2010-012/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42178-vha-directive-2010-009/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42179-vha-directive-2009-048/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42180-vha-directive-2009-047/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42150-vha-directive-2008-071/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42181-vha-directive-2008-070/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/44263-vha-directive-2008-005/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42182-vha-directive-2007-039/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42183-vha-directive-2007-024/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42184-vha-directive-2007-016/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42185-vha-directive-2007-013/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42186-vha-directive-2006-057/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/40994-va-vha-directive-2006-013/ http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?/topic/42187-vha-directive-2000-029/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • 0

Nehmer Ihd Decision Finally Arrived.

Question

Posted

Hi All just looking for some thoughts and advice on the recent rating I received for my Ischemic Heart Disease decision from the VA.

The Nehmer claim went back to July 1988. I was found to be rated 30% after evidence of IHD was submitted (coded) at that time during a C&P for PTSD.

Then I was rated 100% in 1993 to 1994 for Coronary Bypass surgery x5. Then it went back down to 30%.

Then I was rated 60% from August 2010 when they did the C&P for my recent AO claim.

I have previously submitted service connection for IHD approx. 4 times.

Now the interesting thing is the evidence they used. It is all listed but it is contradictory, and found in the VA favor instead of the veteran.

For the initial 1988 rating of thirty percent it states. "Evidence shows you suffered a myocardial infarction in April 1988, this is evidence in a VA exam submitted in July 1988. This is the initial claim date for the purposes of Nehmer". etc. etc. Now in the rating portion it says: "While evidence of a heart condition is shown in a VA Exam done in July 1988, a myocardial infarction was ruled out. A rating of 30% is assigned due to moderate reoccurring episodes of angina pectoris, as shown in the evidence".

Now in the Rating for 100% in 1993 it says " Evidence shows you we admitted for possible myocardial infarction. This was ruled out by Dr. *******. However, an angioplasty was performed at this time, and evidence of post myocardial infarction was found." and "It was found in evidence that you had a CABG x5 performed in April of 1993. This qualifies you for temporary 100% for one year and one month from the date of surgery.

Then the rating dropped back to 30%. "You have been assigned a rating of 30% from June 1994.........There is no evidence of cardiac abnormality. A stress test performed in 1990 shows no cardiac symptoms and was normal ......You denied any shortness of breath, chest pain on exertion or dyspnea, a finding of 30% is appropriate"....

The rating for 60%..."Evidence shows a history of heart disease abnormalities and severe unstable angina pectoris. IN a VA exam performed in August 2010 Dr. **** found evidence of IHD. An electrocardiogram found wave abnormalities, and an ejectionfraction of 45. METs are estimated at 4. Evidence also show a valve insuffiency due to post myocardial infarction, and previous CABG surgery. Patient is currently medically managed and it at a maximum for this therapy".

0% SC for Bypass Scar on Chest, (didn't include the scar from my groin to my ankle where they took the vein out to use in my heart (which would bring it to 10% for SC'ed scar)

SMC S from 1993 to 1994, and from August 2010 to

O.k so now that is out of the way. My perspective. I have been on SSD since my first heart attack in 1988, I have received multiple checks on this since I was first rated with SSD. Each time i was found unemployable solely due to my heart condition. I have been on medications since 1988 that I can never stop or my heart will stop beating. The VA have based some of the ratings on estimated ejection fractions while the actual tests have a much lower ejection fraction that was never taken into consideration. I have not been allowed to take a stress test by my cardiologist for nearly ten years because of the liability issue. I have been told never to take one because it may kill me. I take around 10 medications just to keep my heart going and have since 1988. I don't understand why I received a 30% rating. (One of my doctor in the evidence they reviewed stated the the time that I was "the worst case of Coronary Artery Disease I have ever had the misfortune to treat. This patient is a candidate for heart transplant". My heart has not gotten better and it has not gotten worse. I don't understand how I could be considered unable to work and completely disabled by the SSD and VA think I have a little angina? Very weird. And apparently I had a heart attack then I didn't then I did, (in 1988). But I actually have had three separate ones. I have had multiplle angioplastys until my CABG x5 and I am not able to be treated surgically since 1993 when I had my surgery. Yes my angina went down after the CABG because I could no longer do anything after that and my level of activity went down drastically to the point of not being able to exercise. So using subjective statements about how I felt is not very good evidence (purely subjective and circumstantial).

Does any know how I should approach this. Should I do a NOD or DRO review? We are talking about 30 years of retro SMC S (Also rated PTSD 100% from 1988) if this goes through so it is definitely worth my time, I just don't know the best way to approach this..... I currently have another claim in, should we wait for this to be decided? (Could take too long though).....

Anyway if you have any input let me know! :-)

(Edited for spelling errors)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 answers to this question

Posted

WOW_ your claims sounds just like mine in many ways- even the 1988 date.

"And apparently I had a heart attack then I didn't then I did, (in 1988)"

I proved misdiagnosed heart attack with the entire EKG strip.Is the strip in your med recs?

The Nehmer update from NVLSP PDF I posted the other day here shows that Footnote One claims ( the essence of Nehmer retro) are being buggered up by the Nehmer VA people.

"Anyway if you have any input let me know!" :

Here's the email I got yesterday from NVLSP: (I had attached the NOD on my award of Feb 2010 when I realized maybe I forgot to send it to them.)

"Dear Ms. Simmons:

Thank you for the update and the scanned NOD. To date, NVLSP has not received a copy of a new decision on your claim from the VA. Once we do, we will review it to ensure that the VA assigns the correct effective date for your IHD benefits. We will contact you about the results of our review at that time. Please let us know if your contact information changes.

Sincerely,

Allison Monyei

Staff Attorney*

National Veterans Legal Services Program

agentorange@nvlsp.org <mailto:agentorange@nvlsp.org>

1.855.333.0677"

Did you email NVLSP at the AO addy I have been posting here since last Fall?

If so please contact the NVLSP lawyer who responded to you.

NVLSP has our back on these AO claims under the 3 new presumptives.

NVLSP is a pro bono l;aw firm- the one who won the Beverly Nehmer decision and court case.

They are certainly not charging any AO claimant to review their VA AO Nehmer decision.

The PDF Power point was done by Bart Stickman, NVLSP (and writer for the VBM)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites






Posted

Good Luck and do what Berta suggested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hey Berta thank you for taking time to reply and offer your advice.....

YES I still have my EKG from 1988 (I don't know how but I do!!!!)

The VA have established July 26 1988 as the EED for Nehmer purposes, which I have no problem with, I do have a problem with the low ball percentage of 30% as at the same time Social Security granted me SSD because I was not able to work, and had diagnosises of severe coronary artery disease severe heart disease and severe angina etc etc, and yet they have given me 30% for angina, I didn't even get teh there noths of temporary 100% for the myocardial infarction. I even went through Voc Rehab because I was unable to continue in the job I had and was trained for. They used a doctor note to justify the 30% where the doctor said I could return to work on May 8th 1988 even though I had been readmitted to the hospital with severe angina and angioplasty and was in hospital until May 18th......It's just ridiculous that they have ignored evidence they even have listed in my ratings decision.

I guess I just need to go over each piece of evidence and find something in the evidence that contradicts it and quote the "in favor of the veteran" law or something.

DO you think a DRO review with an interview before the adjudicator would be best in this situation? Of should I just file a NOD.

It is my understanding the NVLSP would only be looking at the EED for nehmer and not the ratings given, just that A RATING was given???? Am I wrong? Will they help me with appealing the rating? Or just the Nehmer EED?

Thanks again for your time

Hawk

WOW_ your claims sounds just like mine in many ways- even the 1988 date.

"And apparently I had a heart attack then I didn't then I did, (in 1988)"

I proved misdiagnosed heart attack with the entire EKG strip.Is the strip in your med recs?

The Nehmer update from NVLSP PDF I posted the other day here shows that Footnote One claims ( the essence of Nehmer retro) are being buggered up by the Nehmer VA people.

"Anyway if you have any input let me know!" :

Here's the email I got yesterday from NVLSP: (I had attached the NOD on my award of Feb 2010 when I realized maybe I forgot to send it to them.)

"Dear Ms. Simmons:

Thank you for the update and the scanned NOD. To date, NVLSP has not received a copy of a new decision on your claim from the VA. Once we do, we will review it to ensure that the VA assigns the correct effective date for your IHD benefits. We will contact you about the results of our review at that time. Please let us know if your contact information changes.

Sincerely,

Allison Monyei

Staff Attorney*

National Veterans Legal Services Program

agentorange@nvlsp.org <mailto:agentorange@nvlsp.org>

1.855.333.0677"

Did you email NVLSP at the AO addy I have been posting here since last Fall?

If so please contact the NVLSP lawyer who responded to you.

NVLSP has our back on these AO claims under the 3 new presumptives.

NVLSP is a pro bono l;aw firm- the one who won the Beverly Nehmer decision and court case.

They are certainly not charging any AO claimant to review their VA AO Nehmer decision.

The PDF Power point was done by Bart Stickman, NVLSP (and writer for the VBM)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I sure commend you for doing your VA homework on all this-because you have an excellent handle on the regs as well as your disability.

This is how claims are WON!

“YES I still have my EKG from 1988 (I don't know how but I do!!!!) “

The EKG should clearly state on top of the bands 'abnormal' EKG or usually expanded to ' possible inferior wall ischemia” or something brief that denotes the initial diagnosis. The PRT etc axis etc also reveal a lot.

“I didn't even get teh there noths of temporary 100% for the myocardial infarction. “

You are right and that is in the IHD schedule of Ratings -I am seeking that too as accrued under Nehmer.

3 months temp 100% after IHD heart attack.1988 (misdiagnosed but proven as IHD CAD)

“DO you think a DRO review with an interview before the adjudicator would be best in this situation? Of should I just file a NOD. “

"It is my understanding the NVLSP would only be looking at the EED for nehmer and not the ratings given, just that A RATING was given???? Am I wrong? Will they help me with appealing the rating? Or just the Nehmer EED? "

It would not make sense to me for them to only consider the EED without looking at the ratings because it is the ratings that provide the correct retro as well as the proper EED.

Their email addy is in the email from NVLSP I got and posted here.

But it is good idea to go to their web site first at this link and read over what info they need for initial contact.

I printed this stuff off and then prepared my first email to them off line so that I had link to the decision in 1995 that put my IHD claim under Nehmer and so I could give them concise info for the little questionnaire in this link:

http://www.nvlsp.org/Information/ArticleLibrary/AgentOrange/AO-VABeginsReview.htm

Are you 100% sure the VA has your SSDI info?????

I have had more input from NVLSP in the past year then VA ever gave me on my claims.

"It's just ridiculous that they have ignored evidence they even have listed in my ratings decision."

They are superb at that. I have never received a proper decision in the past 17 years until I raised Hell and raised 38 CFR to them. And even when I sent them the actual regs, they still couldn't apply them right.

However my 2 AO claims are the sole claims I have not succeeded in----yet.

In the late 1990s NVLSP found out the VA was inproperly awarding AO retro.

Since they were the lawyers who won the Beverly Nehmer decision they went right into the VAROs and kicked butt-legally.

Tousands of AO vets received more retro comp due to their efforts.

I remeber all this well but this was prior to the internet as we know it.

NVLSP had to access VARO records and had no other way to reach all vets who VA had snookered retro from.

The internet has made this easier for them to do regarding these 3 new presumptives.

Although VA said NVLSP would get their list of potential Nehmer claimants- many were never put on this list.Like me and a few others here.

The email addy is the only way to insure NVLSP will review your decision.

I know local Nehmer vet-I had to show him my tax return for my last donation to NVLSP to prove to him they are non profit.

And their letter of acknowledgement and non profit Receipt I had to give to my tax lady for my tax return.

He fully believed they would charge him $$$ if they reviewed his Nehmer decision but they are non profit pro bono.

I think the VA messed his claim up too.

One thing is for sure- although NVLSP is reviewing Nehmer decisions they are aware of- that NOD filing time will still loom over us all so the NOD should be filed even if NVLSP reviews the claim as they cannot alter the NOD one year deadline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"It is my understanding the NVLSP would only be looking at the EED for nehmer and not the ratings given, just that A RATING was given???? Am I wrong? Will they help me with appealing the rating? Or just the Nehmer EED? "

It would not make sense to me for them to only consider the EED without looking at the ratings because it is the ratings that provide the correct retro as well as the proper EED............

I just saw that in a post in the AO forum-that seems to indicate NVLSP isnt looking at the ratings.........??????

I am quite concerned on that and will email my NVLSP contact today-

If Footnote One is causing many of the Nehmer problems ( as the recent pdf from NVLSP reveals)

Footnote one involves the % the VA gave the vet so why arent they looking at ratings?????

This is VERY concerning to me.

Maybe many Nehmer vets will have to file CUE claims on prior past ratings if NVLSP isnt helping with that.???????

I will see what NVLSP has to say on this and let all know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pages 32 and 33 of the NVLSP Nehmer Training Guide puts the Onus on the VA to properly rate these claims:

http://www.nvlsp.org/Information/ArticleLibrary/AgentOrange/20100928%20NehmerTrainingGuide.pdf

But NVLSP makes this point there as well:

"NOTE: Nehmer decisions will be stand-alone documents as they will be reviewed without the claims folder by others as well as class counsel. Class counsel will not have the claims folder during their review, therefore, it is crucial all evidence pertinent to the presumptive condition(s) is listed and properly discussed in the decision."

This is why I sent the Nehmer contact lawyer I have- what I thought was the most pertinent evidence they needed to have.

I need to check again to see if I sent them my SMC CUE claim info.

You asked here some Very Good questions about Nehmer and us advocates are in the dark because there are no new Nehmer claims at the BVA- and we dont have privy to RO decisions.

When RDT replies to me in the AO forum, I can then contact NVLSP as it seems to me if the VA errs in a rating under the Nehmer Training Guide, NVLSP should question it- if they know it is wrong based on what evidence they had for the review- as mentioned above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

RDT confirms his email here came from NVLSP:

"Unfortunately, the Court's Orders only permit NVLSP to complain to the Nehmer

Court about certain issues, such as the effective date assigned by the VA. Issues including the accuracy of the rating percentage assigned by the VA are outside the Nehmer Court's authority, and thus beyond the scope of NVLSP's representation. However, the rating percentage can be challenged through the normal VA appeal process (filing a Notice of Disagreement, submitting a Substantive Appeal, etc.) with the assistance of your VSO" .

I feel that is not quite what the Training letter under Nehmer says at all.

The training letter states:

"Coding and Assigning a Percentage

The Cardiovascular System in the Rating Schedule was revised effective January 12, 1998. A grant of IHD prior to January 12, 1998, will require application of the Rating Schedule that was applicable on January 12, 1998. These evaluations are protected if there is no change in the condition AND the new regulation would result in a lower evaluation. However, if the new criteria provides for a higher evaluation, grant the entitlement effective the change in regulation. 38 U.S.C. § 1155; 38 C.F.R. § 3.114(a).

Special Monthly Compensation

Special monthly compensation entitlement must be considered as appropriate. Many times (S)1 (schedular housebound - single 100 percent and additional 33 etc etc "

Does anyone here see the same conflict as I do in my interpretation of the Nehmer Training Guide statements and the email RDT received?

I need to do some more research before I contact NVLSP on this because since the VA did a CRA report ( a questimate on the costs of the new 3 AOs when some Congressman griped ) how can the VA validate any follow up cost analysis if the ratings on some of these Nehmer claims are wrong? I need to find and re read the CRA report again.I posted it here at hadit last year.

Certainly wrong ratings can be appealed but Time is the enemy of Vietnam veterans as well as their surviving spouses.

The new AOs ,in my opinion, considering the average age of Vietnam veterans now, would allow them proper SC in their remaining years to rectify the damage AO did to them although compensation never can compensate for the severe disabilities that the 3 new AOs are.

Does anyone here, familiar with the Nehmer Training Guide and the CRA report ,see what I mean?

AS I understand it, the Nehmer Court Order was to "re adjudicate" these claims.Would that not encompass inclusion a VA rating under the new AO regs that is proper and thus part of the NVLSP review?

any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hey Berta, thank you for replying.....

Hmmmmmmmm so nehmer won't help then.

I just remembered my husband went through voc rehab way back in 1988 after his heart attack.....because he couldn't continue his job (METS went down?)......This evidence was not considered. Should voc rehab records be in the c-file or would they be held elsewhere?I could maybe submit with new and material evidence then????

I am still trying to decided on a CUE or DRO Review...or N&M evidence..... gah!!!! this is so frustrating. in you experience what would be a better way to go.....what sort of things qualify as a CUE if nehmer won't help with ratings problems. Would an IMO help do you think???

Sorry about all the questions. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think you could ask them to CUE themselves as to the ratings and tell them why the ratings are wrong.

However- although asking them to do this might get your claim faster attention- still they could decide not to act on that so best to mark your calender for the NOD one year deadline to make sure that is filed in timely fashion.

“Does any know how I should approach this. Should I do a NOD or DRO review? We are talking about 30 years of retro SMC S (Also rated PTSD 100% from 1988) if this goes through so it is definitely worth my time, I just don't know the best way to approach this..... I currently have another claim in, should we wait for this to be decided? (Could take too long though)..... “

A DRO review could definitely possibly help straighten this all out.I sure would want you to have a very good rep who would be present at the hearing if that is possible. I think others here might agree on the DRO hearing-and hope they chime in.

I fully expect my ratings to be incorrect and although I sent them the rating info they need-I intend to ask them to CUE themselves too if they dont do it right- and also I will file NOD if they dont act on the CUE request within one year.

Has NVLSP reviewed this decision yet?

“For the initial 1988 rating of thirty percent it states. "Evidence shows you suffered a myocardial infarction in April 1988, this is evidence in a VA exam submitted in July 1988. This is the initial claim date for the purposes of Nehmer". etc. etc. Now in the rating portion it says: "While evidence of a heart condition is shown in a VA Exam done in July 1988, a myocardial infarction was ruled out. A rating of 30% is assigned due to moderate reoccurring episodes of angina pectoris, as shown in the evidence".

A MI is far different from angina- this makes no sense.

“Now in the Rating for 100% in 1993 it says " Evidence shows you we admitted for possible myocardial infarction. This was ruled out by Dr. *******. However, an angioplasty was performed at this time, and evidence of post myocardial infarction was found." and "It was found in evidence that you had a CABG x5 performed in April of 1993. This qualifies you for temporary 100% for one year and one month from the date of surgery. “

The temp 100 is right but their medical rationale here is ridiculous.

“SMC S from 1993 to 1994, and from August 2010 to “

Is this S rating due to the Temp 100%?

“I have been on SSD since my first heart attack in 1988” Did they even mention this evidence at all???

There is ,in my opinion, a lot wrong with this decision.

“We are talking about 30 years of retro SMC S (Also rated PTSD 100% from 1988 “

That is well worth fighting over.!!!!

As you know my claim is for IHD accrued as SMC. I have asked them for the SMC “M” award as “S” is unacceptable due to my husband's multiple SC disabilities.

But I also have a pending CUE claim for SMC accrued.

The VA had failed to properly rate and consider SMC when the medical evidence warranted it.

Do you have any old decisions that were denied and Not appealed that could potentially be basis for that type of CUE claim?

From what I see here- probably not-but I hope others read this over and opine here too.

I feel the VA will definitely either mess up SMC awards under the new regs or forget the dependency

factor in the retro.

It looks to me as though -in your case- they manipulated some evidence and then forgot the rest of it.

It also looks to me that,if they were aware of the SSA solely for the IHD- then why isnt the rating 100% or TDIU for the entire retro period? Pklusthe SMC S award?

I have been working on my AO claims lately because I want to know what to expect and I am developing a War Plan.(IE-my plan of attack over anything wrong in the decision) War Plans helped me succeed before with my claims.It is just a way of making sure absolutely no stone is left unturned as far as evidence goes.(medical or legal evidence as for the CUE claims)

These AO claims can become quite intricate and time consuming to deal with=even when the decisions come and that is the time to find any errors they made and act on those errors.

Has NVLSP reviewed this decision yet?

Has a vet rep reviewed it yet?

“I currently have another claim in, should we wait for this to be decided? “

I wouldn't wait on fighting this Nehmer claim.

Once the AO SMC is properly established (if they did err on the retro on that) then the other claim could perhaps put you into a higher SMC criteria.

Again -I hope others here will chime in on this.

They want to finish these Nehmer claims by Oct 31st so I expect we will be getting many more AO Nehmer questions in this forum as well as our AO forum.

Nehmer vets and widows widowers read hadit as guests and are looking for our best input on their decisions.

I think the NVLSP AO email addy is in this thread.

It would help if we can read their input if vets will post anything they get from NVLSP regarding their AO Nehmer claims as it could help many others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites












  • HadIt.com Twitter