Jump to content



Search



Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup
@  vet201060 : (28 August 2014 - 09:55 PM) Va Is So Shameful!!
@  artlouis : (27 August 2014 - 11:36 AM) Code 7019
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 11:41 PM) Damn Post It Notes
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 11:41 PM) True That
@  Asiadaug : (26 August 2014 - 07:46 PM) I Have Yet To Deal With Any Piece Of Va That Isn't A Dysfunctional Mess...ebenefits, Claim Filing, Billing...and To Think Our Tax Dollars Are Used To Perpetuate That Calamity!
@  carlie : (26 August 2014 - 05:39 PM) notorious kelly - loved your shout ! ! !
@  GlassRose1500 : (26 August 2014 - 03:40 PM) Would Someone Add Smc Housbound Plus Smc A&a Regular And One Smc K For Me? I Can't Seem To Do That Math!
@  Notorious Kelly : (26 August 2014 - 03:12 PM) Ebenefits Is Not A Thermometer In The Rectum Of Your Claim; It Is A Post-It Note That May Or Not Be Updated Or Accurate. Try Not To Obsess ;)
@  mcassidy : (26 August 2014 - 01:25 PM) Osa
@  Jaluluah11B : (26 August 2014 - 10:05 AM) My Reconsideration Finally Showed Up On Ebenefits As A New Claim.  gathering Evidence.  [font=Arial][size=3]Automated 5103 Notice Response Needed. [/size][/font]
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 10:00 AM) Went From Pending Decision Approval To Review Of Evidence Today, I Need To Stop Looking At It. Drives You Crazy Waiting
@  GlassRose1500 : (25 August 2014 - 09:30 PM) @coriemboh I Get My Best Claim Advice Here, But My Dav Guy Gets The Best Intel Once The Claim Is Filed
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:57 PM) The Average Processing Time Is 9 Months More Or Less. Every Time I Call The 800#, I Get A Different Answer. Goe, Roe....make Up Your Mind!
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:56 PM) I Just Want To Know Ballpark Figure Of How Much Longer My Claim Will Take. The Bills Are Piling Up. Adds To My Anxiety And Depression. Sure Wish I Could Tell Bill Collectors The Same Things Va Tells Me!
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:54 PM) @glassrose1500-No, I Don't. I Put In For Representation A Few Days Ago, But I'm Sure That End Won't Pan Out Until The Claim Is Closed.
@  GlassRose1500 : (25 August 2014 - 12:11 PM) Would Appreciate Feedback On My Smc Draft - Posted In The Smc Section! Tkx!
@  GlassRose1500 : (25 August 2014 - 12:04 PM) @coriemboh - Do You Have A Service Rep You Can Call? They Usually Have More Info...
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 11:16 AM) Called The 800 # To Check Status Of Claim. Really Frustrated With The Lack Of Information.
@  vet201060 : (25 August 2014 - 10:12 AM) Just Checked Ebenefits And Claim Was Pending Decision Approval And Then Checked Few Minutes After That And Now Prep For Decision. Drives Me Crazy
@  coriemboh : (24 August 2014 - 10:00 PM) Anyone Else Having A Hard Time With Evet Updates? Mine Is Taking Forever!

Photo

Wings Claims My Contentions Are Wrong

forced abortion ptsd mst

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic

#1 mysticcherokee usn vet

 
mysticcherokee usn vet

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:02 AM

I have been looking at claims and almost immediatly came upon one that mirrors my complaint. Yet Wings you claim that Im accusing our military (ya know the one that a lot of people are saying they got screwed by) of being like NAZIS, in forcing women to get abortions. That YOU represent the entire forum in your opine of my dilemmma.This appellant was in almost exact years I was, and has exact same complaints.:BUT IM A LIAR WINGS. You give yourself to much credit , with sticking your head in the sand ostrich like, and swearing the whole forum is down there in the sand with you. Jeez, can I get a little love here sister friend! Mystic

http://www.va.gov/ve...es1/9801361.txt

INTRODUCTION

The veteran served on active duty from April 1978 to June
1979. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional
Office (RO) denied benefits sought, and the veteran appealed.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) remanded the case to
the RO in March 1995. Thereafter, the RO granted two of the
service connection claims which had been remanded, and now
increased rating appeals have since been perfected and are
currently before the Board for the two disabilities for which
the RO granted service connection.



CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL

The veteran contends that she was raped in service, became
pregnant, and was forced to have an abortion against her
wishes and beliefs, and that as a result, she began abusing
alcohol and developed psychiatric problems. Therefore, she
asserts, service connection is warranted for a chronic
acquired psychiatric disability. The representative
maintains that if this claim is not allowed on the basis of
in-service incurrence, it must be remanded to the RO to have
the RO address the presumption of soundness on service
entrance examination.

THIS IS A GREAT POST!

Advertise Here

 

#2 Wings

 
Wings

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12762 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:54 AM

I have been looking at claims and almost immediatly came upon one that mirrors my complaint. Yet Wings you claim that Im accusing our military (ya know the one that a lot of people are saying they got screwed by) of being like NAZIS, in forcing women to get abortions. That YOU represent the entire forum in your opine of my dilemmma.This appellant was in almost exact years I was, and has exact same complaints.:BUT IM A LIAR WINGS. You give yourself to much credit , with sticking your head in the sand ostrich like, and swearing the whole forum is down there in the sand with you. Jeez, can I get a little love here sister friend! Mystic

http://www.va.gov/ve...es1/9801361.txt

INTRODUCTION

The veteran served on active duty from April 1978 to June
1979. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional
Office (RO) denied benefits sought, and the veteran appealed.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) remanded the case to
the RO in March 1995. Thereafter, the RO granted two of the
service connection claims which had been remanded, and now
increased rating appeals have since been perfected and are
currently before the Board for the two disabilities for which
the RO granted service connection.



CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL

The veteran contends that she was raped in service, became
pregnant, and was forced to have an abortion against her
wishes and beliefs, and that as a result, she began abusing
alcohol and developed psychiatric problems. Therefore, she
asserts, service connection is warranted for a chronic
acquired psychiatric disability. The representative
maintains that if this claim is not allowed on the basis of
in-service incurrence, it must be remanded to the RO to have
the RO address the presumption of soundness on service
entrance examination.

THIS IS A GREAT POST!



x
x
x

MODS (Carlie), Unless this thread gets real HOT, please don't lock it. Let's see if me and my sister can reach an understanding ;-)

Mystic, Let me read and respond. Please give me a few moments to compose myself ... ~Wings

Edited by Wings, 01 March 2012 - 10:55 AM.


#3 Bonzai

 
Bonzai

    E-6 Petty Officer 1st Class

  • Chief Petty Officers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 341 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:55 AM

If you want to fight with another member - do not do it in posts. Read the rules of the Board - Personal attacks are not tolerated.

Much goes on in the military that should not, we all know that.

#4 Wings

 
Wings

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12762 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:21 AM

If you want to fight with another member - do not do it in posts. Read the rules of the Board - Personal attacks are not tolerated.

Much goes on in the military that should not, we all know that.


x
x
x

I'm not going to fight with Mytic. I need a couple of hours to reflect, before I respond. ~Wings

#5 carlie

 
carlie

    Moderator/Admin/HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22036 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:22 AM

I have been looking at claims and almost immediatly came upon one that mirrors my complaint. Yet Wings you claim that Im accusing our military (ya know the one that a lot of people are saying they got screwed by) of being like NAZIS, in forcing women to get abortions. That YOU represent the entire forum in your opine of my dilemmma.This appellant was in almost exact years I was, and has exact same complaints.:BUT IM A LIAR WINGS. You give yourself to much credit , with sticking your head in the sand ostrich like, and swearing the whole forum is down there in the sand with you. Jeez, can I get a little love here sister friend! Mystic

http://www.va.gov/ve...es1/9801361.txt

INTRODUCTION

The veteran served on active duty from April 1978 to June
1979. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional
Office (RO) denied benefits sought, and the veteran appealed.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) remanded the case to
the RO in March 1995. Thereafter, the RO granted two of the
service connection claims which had been remanded, and now
increased rating appeals have since been perfected and are
currently before the Board for the two disabilities for which
the RO granted service connection.



CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL

The veteran contends that she was raped in service, became
pregnant, and was forced to have an abortion against her
wishes and beliefs, and that as a result, she began abusing
alcohol and developed psychiatric problems. Therefore, she
asserts, service connection is warranted for a chronic
acquired psychiatric disability. The representative
maintains that if this claim is not allowed on the basis of
in-service incurrence, it must be remanded to the RO to have
the RO address the presumption of soundness on service
entrance examination.

THIS IS A GREAT POST!


And it goes on to state :


"It has been contended that this case should be remanded for
the RO to consider the presumption of soundness at induction.
38 U.S.C.A. § 1111 (West 1991). Although the RO has
apparently not considered this presumption, the veteran is
not prejudiced by this failure.

First, the representative’s
argument shows that the veteran and representative have had
an opportunity for argument and hearing on this point. Where
there has been such an opportunity, it is not prejudicial for
the Board to consider a question in the first instance.

Curry v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 59 (1994) cert. denied 48 F.3d
1237 (1995).
Second,

the result in this case does not turn
on the presumption of soundness but on the lack of competent
evidence of a nexus between current disability and service.

Additionally, where, as here,

the Board has denied the claim
on the basis that it is not well grounded, whereas the RO had
considered it on the merits, there is no prejudice to the
veteran, as the RO accorded her claim more consideration than

it was entitled. Id. The benefit of the doubt doctrine does
not apply, as the claim is not well grounded. 38
U.S.C.A. § 5107; Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49, 55
(1991). "

Edited by carlie, 01 March 2012 - 11:23 AM.
size


#6 mysticcherokee usn vet

 
mysticcherokee usn vet

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:23 AM

No attack, merely a constitutional right. For the accused to face their accuser. Court of law is good enough for me.

Heres yet another claim of forced abortion, and mind you they won.

http://www.va.gov/ve...es2/1016362.txt



This isnt meant as an assault, truth be told, just countering what I felt was an assault on my honor.
You might feel the same in my position, ut since ya dont, nobody is forcing you to read this, with all due respect. Mystic

#7 mysticcherokee usn vet

 
mysticcherokee usn vet

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:26 AM

Carlie, the denial was for allegies and such. However there were two items noted in the beginning that were approved, and I dont know for sure what they were, but I know what she claims. Nowhere does it state that her claim of rape and coercion to abort were denied or dismissed, remanded or any other thing, so it must have been approved. Mystic

#8 mysticcherokee usn vet

 
mysticcherokee usn vet

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 188 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:30 AM

Besides Wings claimed that my very contetion of rape and coercion from the military was ludicrous, and accused me of comparing the military to the Gestapo. The last of that is ludicrous and Ive proven my contentions are real and not at all unbelievable, as evidenced in these(rightoff the top) case scenarios.I win,shes a loser,imo. case/Thread closed

#9 Tbird

 
Tbird

    Founder HadIt.com established 1997

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 75 posts
 

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:35 AM

Please put each other on your ignore list if you can't be civil. I don't know and don't care how or who or what got this started just take it off the board.




Advertise Here