Jump to content



Search



Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:54 PM) Tbird Accepted To 2015 Conference: V-Wise: Another Entrepreneurship Project Of The Whitman School Of Management Http://ow.ly/ej9Qg
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:13 PM) Arng11 Thank You For Your Contribution To Our Funding Campaign.
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 02:57 PM) Thank You Ms T For Starting This Web Site For All Veterans, You Helpd Me And My Family And I'll Be Forever Gratful To You & Hadit.com
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:19 AM) Thank You All For Helping With The Funding The Site. It Is Really Helping!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:18 AM) Britton Pm Me And I. Can Check This Out For You
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 06:44 AM) What Does ''you Missed Your Quota For Postives Votes Today'' Mean??
@  coriemboh : (19 November 2014 - 08:29 AM) Hold Time For Peggy Was Approximately 1 Minute. That Was 17 Minutes Ago. They Really Need To Change This Hold Music.
@  Tbird : (17 November 2014 - 02:42 PM) Stretch Thanks For The Extra Contribution To Our Fundraiser This Month.
@  maxwell18 : (16 November 2014 - 09:04 PM) I Still Have To Bitch About The Navy Hosp Cutting My Meds By 2/3 On My Norco. I Contacted Customer Service Or What Ever You Want To Call It Who In Turn Contacted The Navy Hosp Pensacola Commander Who In Turn Did Nothing. Thanks To All The People That Are Affair Of There Jobs And I Feel That Medical Malpractice Should Come Into Place. I Guess Just Do What Ever They Want To Because They Can, But Don't Give A Sh T For The Vets That Suppose To Being Supporting From All The Military  organizations. This Is Not The Way They Have Been Trained And Promised To Do. 
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:26 AM) Delayed Onset Tinnitus - Ref To Va Training Letter 10-028 - Link - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/single-Judge-Application-Va-Training-Letter-10-028-Delayed-Onset-Tinnitus/
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:03 AM) Here's A Good Tinnitus Link To Check Out From M21-1 Change Dated Jan 10,2014 - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/tag/section-B-Duty-Military-Occupational-Specialty-Mos-Noise-Exposure-Listing-Fast-Letter-10-35-Tinnitus-Hearing-Loss-Vbms-Rating-Decision-Tools/
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:08 AM) "rolled" Not Ruled! :)
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:07 AM) Thanks. I Have Seen The Fast Ltr 10-35 And Have Seen Cases Where The Va Has Apparently Agreed That Tinnitus Can Have Delayed Onset. I Did Not In Looking Over The Fast Ltr See Where They Had Ruled 10-028 Into That. And, I Am Not Sure In The Vas Issuance Of ‘policy’ Type Letters How They Might Roll In Previous Instructions Into Newer Ones. Maybe There Is Some Intranet Traceability Capability? I Was Just Curious As There ‘appeared’ To Be Conspicuous Absence Of That 10-028. I Am Assuming 10-028 Was Written In 2010. But It May Be I Should Not Assume Anything.
@  carlie : (15 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Asiadaug - You Might Be Looking For Fast Letter 10-35, Http://www.hadit.com/forums/topic/40962-Va-Fl-10-35/ Also Check Out This Link To Links For Delayed Onset Tinnitus - They All Refer Back To Fast Letter 10-35, Https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=Chrome-Instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=Utf-8#q=Tinnitus, Delayed Onset, Va Fast Letter
@  Tbird : (15 November 2014 - 07:50 AM) Asiadaug Searched All Over For Va Training Letter 10-028 But No Luck So Far.
@  Asiadaug : (15 November 2014 - 02:12 AM) Several Cases I've Run Across Mention Va Training Letter 10-028 With Apparent Discussion About Delayed Onset Of Tinnitus. I Have Been Unable To Locate That Trng Ltr. Any Suggestions?
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Stretch Thanks For Contributing To Our Fundraising Campairg
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 04:01 AM) Atomicwidow Thank Your For Donating To Our Funding Campaign.
@  Tbird : (11 November 2014 - 07:00 AM) Veterans Day 2014 - Veterans Thank You For Your Service And Your Sacrifice.
@  Tbird : (10 November 2014 - 07:19 AM) Semper Fi Marines

Photo

Changing Tdiu To 100% Schedular


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
13 replies to this topic

#1 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:46 AM

What is the common procedure when your rated TDIU and later awarded enough ratings to qualify for 100% schedular and you want to have it changed.


Coot

#2 Philip Rogers

 
Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3972 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 09:25 AM

Cooter - I don't know that they do. I believe it's almost impossible to reach 100% schedular, unless you have a single 100% disability. jmo

pr

#3 Medic

 
Medic

    E-3 Seaman

  • Seaman
  • PipPipPip
  • 27 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 09:31 AM

I believe the VA will do it on it's own - when the time comes for your re-evaulation of TDIU. Personlally I'll leave it alone unless there is a job you are wishing to work currently.

#4 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:15 AM

.Thanks PR & Medic. I been wondering about that for a long time and didn't know how they do it, or if they did it at all. Now That I have your guys attention..lol..How do they configure your % ratings for SMC if your TDIU on a single rating? Lets say I am rated at 60-20-10 and was granted TDIU just on the 60%. Will they figure the other 2, "20-10" with the required 60 to make it 160% total? Hope you understand what I'm trying to say...lol


Coot

#5 Philip Rogers

 
Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3972 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:24 AM

Coot - you'll need another 60%, in addition to the 60% used for TDIU. Also they use the combined ratings table, which I, personally, disagree with, especially if the claimant has a single 100% rating. Just another way of screwing the vet.

pr

#6 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:41 AM

OK, Thanks John. Just to clarify, will they use my other 20 & 10 for the 60?


Coot

#7 Philip Rogers

 
Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3972 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:16 PM

Yes, your other 20% + 10% will go toward the additional 60%, provided it's only your 60% that is used towards your TDIU.

pr



OK, Thanks John. Just to clarify, will they use my other 20 & 10 for the 60?


Coot



#8 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:11 PM

Mucho Gras PR!!


Coot

#9 john999

 
john999

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22327 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:32 PM

The way I got my "S" was I had 80% TDIU when I got an additional 60% for a single issue. I did have to file a CUE claim to get my "S" since this was around the time that it became known you could get S if you had total plus 60%. If I had not filed I would still be waiting and wondering. The VA has tried to limit their liability in these total plus 60% cases I think. Teac told me about it and he has not got his and Phil has been trying to get it for years since when he got 100% they should have considered him for "S" at that time. They will swear they did, but there is no written proof that most 100% vets were ever considered for S without have 100% plus 60%. Also some DX'es are sign posts for a "S" rating.

#10 Berta

 
Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29010 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 02:30 PM

They will swear they did, but there is no written proof that most 100% vets were ever considered for S without have 100% plus 60%. Also "some DX'es are sign posts for a "S" rating. "

John is right. That is the initial basis of the CUE claim I won.

The veteran (my husband) was 100% P & T due to SC PTSD.

He had other disabilities that fell under Section 1151 ( now AO disabilties too)

In a 1998 decision the VA failed to consider him properly for SMC. His CVA under Section 1151 was rated (incorrectly) at 80% (changed to 100% 1151 in the decision)

His 1151 IHD, that VA never rated at all in the 1998 decision, and should have rated , was awarded under Nehmer instead of 1151 last month.

.

SMC is a statuatory benefit by mandate.I sent them an excerpt from the VBM as well as M21-1MR to prove that.

It is basic VA 101 that VA MUST consider eligibiity to SMC whenever the disabilities warrant it to be considered.I mean the disabilities have to have been established by VA

The mandate doesnt say they Must award, it says they must consider it , and if they fail to do that, that is a clear and unmistakable error if you can also prove that their error prevented you from attaining SMC.

Edited by Berta, 07 March 2012 - 02:31 PM.


#11 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:16 PM

The mandate doesnt say they Must award, it says they must consider it , and if they fail to do that, that is a clear and unmistakable error if you can also prove that their error prevented you from attaining SMC.


,I'm glad you brought that up Berta, thats interesting. So what your saying above is, if in the Reasons & Bases section of the decision letter, it has to state SMC was considered, or stated in another reasonable matter, and if it is not noted, therefore you have credible evidence for an NOD or CUE. Am I to understand this correctly Berta or John.

#12 Philip Rogers

 
Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3972 posts
 

Posted 08 March 2012 - 07:05 AM

coot - that is correct. There should be a statement of "some kind," in the reasons and bases" section, as to why SMC was not awarded. I believe, technically, it is a claim that remains "open" and therefore not a CUE. Remember this is only when the claimant is awarded a 100% schedular rating, for one disability and not a combined total of 100%. I would send the VA a letter requesting the status of the inferred SMC issue claim. jmo

pr



The mandate doesnt say they Must award, it says they must consider it , and if they fail to do that, that is a clear and unmistakable error if you can also prove that their error prevented you from attaining SMC.


,I'm glad you brought that up Berta, thats interesting. So what your saying above is, if in the Reasons & Bases section of the decision letter, it has to state SMC was considered, or stated in another reasonable matter, and if it is not noted, therefore you have credible evidence for an NOD or CUE. Am I to understand this correctly Berta or John.



#13 cooter

 
cooter

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts
 

Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:04 PM

Thanks PR, and yes I did forget this is only for 100% schedular for one disability. That makes a big difference.


Coot

#14 Teac

 
Teac

    E-8 Senior Chief Petty Officer

  • Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1158 posts
 

Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:38 AM

What is the common procedure when your rated TDIU and later awarded enough ratings to qualify for 100% schedular and you want to have it changed.
Coot


Cooter,

I found myself in this situtation. I was awarded TDIU for a 60% back injury in 1999. In 2007 my asthma/copd was increased from a 60% rating to a 100% rating, The va automatically revoked my TDIU rating. Keep in mind that the VA says that a veteran cannot have a TDIU and a 100% rating at the same time. Also the VA says a 100% rating moots consideration of a TDIU rating. Of course there is nothing that I have found that states a TDIU rating must be revoked on award of a 100% rating... but I'll leave that to another day.

Fast foward to bradley v peake which clearly indicates TDIU holds the swame weight as a 100% rating for SMC purposes......but that is another ongoing conversation.....

Edited by Teac, 19 March 2012 - 05:19 PM.