Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  arng11 : (26 November 2014 - 11:30 AM) Everyone Enjoy The Holidays And Be Safe.
@  eagle1012004 : (26 November 2014 - 10:10 AM) Have A Happy Thanksgiving All!!!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:54 PM) Tbird Accepted To 2015 Conference: V-Wise: Another Entrepreneurship Project Of The Whitman School Of Management Http://ow.ly/ej9Qg
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:13 PM) Arng11 Thank You For Your Contribution To Our Funding Campaign.
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 02:57 PM) Thank You Ms T For Starting This Web Site For All Veterans, You Helpd Me And My Family And I'll Be Forever Gratful To You & Hadit.com
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:19 AM) Thank You All For Helping With The Funding The Site. It Is Really Helping!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:18 AM) Britton Pm Me And I. Can Check This Out For You
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 06:44 AM) What Does ''you Missed Your Quota For Postives Votes Today'' Mean??
@  coriemboh : (19 November 2014 - 08:29 AM) Hold Time For Peggy Was Approximately 1 Minute. That Was 17 Minutes Ago. They Really Need To Change This Hold Music.
@  Tbird : (17 November 2014 - 02:42 PM) Stretch Thanks For The Extra Contribution To Our Fundraiser This Month.
@  maxwell18 : (16 November 2014 - 09:04 PM) I Still Have To Bitch About The Navy Hosp Cutting My Meds By 2/3 On My Norco. I Contacted Customer Service Or What Ever You Want To Call It Who In Turn Contacted The Navy Hosp Pensacola Commander Who In Turn Did Nothing. Thanks To All The People That Are Affair Of There Jobs And I Feel That Medical Malpractice Should Come Into Place. I Guess Just Do What Ever They Want To Because They Can, But Don't Give A Sh T For The Vets That Suppose To Being Supporting From All The Military  organizations. This Is Not The Way They Have Been Trained And Promised To Do. 
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:26 AM) Delayed Onset Tinnitus - Ref To Va Training Letter 10-028 - Link - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/single-Judge-Application-Va-Training-Letter-10-028-Delayed-Onset-Tinnitus/
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:03 AM) Here's A Good Tinnitus Link To Check Out From M21-1 Change Dated Jan 10,2014 - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/tag/section-B-Duty-Military-Occupational-Specialty-Mos-Noise-Exposure-Listing-Fast-Letter-10-35-Tinnitus-Hearing-Loss-Vbms-Rating-Decision-Tools/
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:08 AM) "rolled" Not Ruled! :)
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:07 AM) Thanks. I Have Seen The Fast Ltr 10-35 And Have Seen Cases Where The Va Has Apparently Agreed That Tinnitus Can Have Delayed Onset. I Did Not In Looking Over The Fast Ltr See Where They Had Ruled 10-028 Into That. And, I Am Not Sure In The Vas Issuance Of ‘policy’ Type Letters How They Might Roll In Previous Instructions Into Newer Ones. Maybe There Is Some Intranet Traceability Capability? I Was Just Curious As There ‘appeared’ To Be Conspicuous Absence Of That 10-028. I Am Assuming 10-028 Was Written In 2010. But It May Be I Should Not Assume Anything.
@  carlie : (15 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Asiadaug - You Might Be Looking For Fast Letter 10-35, Http://www.hadit.com/forums/topic/40962-Va-Fl-10-35/ Also Check Out This Link To Links For Delayed Onset Tinnitus - They All Refer Back To Fast Letter 10-35, Https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=Chrome-Instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=Utf-8#q=Tinnitus, Delayed Onset, Va Fast Letter
@  Tbird : (15 November 2014 - 07:50 AM) Asiadaug Searched All Over For Va Training Letter 10-028 But No Luck So Far.
@  Asiadaug : (15 November 2014 - 02:12 AM) Several Cases I've Run Across Mention Va Training Letter 10-028 With Apparent Discussion About Delayed Onset Of Tinnitus. I Have Been Unable To Locate That Trng Ltr. Any Suggestions?
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Stretch Thanks For Contributing To Our Fundraising Campairg
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 04:01 AM) Atomicwidow Thank Your For Donating To Our Funding Campaign.


Gulf War Claim Results = Irs Math?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic

#1 BFR


    E-4 Petty Officer 3rd Class

  • Second Class Petty Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 57 posts

Posted 22 April 2012 - 05:19 PM

I applied three of the conditions under the Gulf War Illness umbrella back in August of 2010. All the appointments were completed about two months ago.

I just got my award letter and while it's a big win in itself I'm confused by the "IRS math" that they used to compute the final percentage so I thought I'd ask the HadIt community for their take.

I started with a 60% (50% for PTSD and 10% for some minor things). The decision for the GWI is as follows:

- 30% for IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
- 20% for FM (Fibromyalgia)
- 10% for CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome)

Getting recognized for the GWI is a win. Getting IBS as a separate rating is also a win.

Here's where the "IRS math" comes in:

60% + 30% + 20% + 10% = 80% combined rating.

Apparently the VBA did not use a linear scale in determining a combined rating. Is this common? Any speculation on chances of getting this corrected? (I expect I should have little trouble getting the FM increased to 40%, and likely getting the CFS to 20% or even 40%.)

Thanks in advance for all answers.


("IRS Math" is a term I once read in a Dave Barry story.)

#2 sharon


    HadIt.com Elder/Moderator

  • Master Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1126 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 01:31 AM

Your math should be 50% + 30% + 20% + 10% + 10%

#3 Philip Rogers

Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3976 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:42 AM

BFR - the VA uses the combined ratings table (CRT) see 38 CFR 4.25. The table uses the "whole" person theory, so that once you deduct the first disability, you are no longer a "whole" person. In your case 50% for PTSD leaves you 50% whole. Now you deduct 30% of that remaining 50%, which would be 15%, which is added to the original 50% for a 65% total disability. Then they take 20% of that remaining "whole" person of 35%, which is 7%, added to 65% and becomes 72%, etc, etc, etc. You can find a link to the table on Hadit's home page or go to 38 CFR 4.25. It kinda makes sense, once you understand it. jmo


#4 Berta


    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29044 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 08:37 AM


"I expect I should have little trouble getting the FM increased to 40%, and likely getting the CFS to 20% or even 40%.")

If this would take an IMO,now is the time to consider using some of that retro top pay for it.

However, are you still wporking?

If Not what did the VA say regarding TDIU? Did they enclose the TDIU form?

It ,might be easier to succeed at this point on a TDIU claim (and m,aybe a better way to spend any IMO money if needed) that to ask for increases at this point.

Then again if you are not working ,I would do both, if I were you.

#5 BFR


    E-4 Petty Officer 3rd Class

  • Second Class Petty Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 57 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:21 AM

I started this case with documentation from an IMO who is board certified in Internal medicine as well as Endocrinology. I have her guidelines that I received from my County rep that gave the specific phrases as well as printouts of sections of the eCFR for to use as a guide. She created a lengthy document that seemed like it should have outweighed the VA doctor, but I guess it's common for the VA to open low and hope you give up.

Thanks for posting the "whole person" theory. I'd heard about that a long time ago but had forgotten. So to see if I have it right the following table should apply:

(remember the numbers are 50, 30, 20, 10. 10.)

Start at 100% Subtract 50%, so 50% of a person left. ................................................................ 50% = rating
subtract 30% of 50% = 15, so the rating is now 50 + 15 = 65%, with 35% of a person left..............+15% = 65
subtract 20% of 35% = 7, so now the rating is 35-7= 28 (rounded to 30%)....................................+ 7% = 80
subtract 10% from 30% = 3 .............................................................................................................+ 3% = 83, but that gets rounded back down to 80%.

Yes, it does make sense in an odd way. Thanks all for explaining this to me.

[Note: I thought I'd posted this a few days back but apparently I forgot to hit "Add Reply." Sorry about that!]


#6 Philip Rogers

Philip Rogers

    HadIt.com Elder

  • HadIt.com Elder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3976 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:48 AM

You basically have it but you don't round, up or down, until after the final combined percentage. Your numbers should be 50% to 65% to 72% to 75%, w/75% rounded up to 80%. If there is a second 10% it would be 50,65,72,75,78 rounded to 80%. Hope this helps.