Jump to content



Search



Toggle shoutbox Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Tbird : (28 November 2014 - 11:03 AM) Thank You Britton That Means A Lot To Me!
@  arng11 : (26 November 2014 - 11:30 AM) Everyone Enjoy The Holidays And Be Safe.
@  eagle1012004 : (26 November 2014 - 10:10 AM) Have A Happy Thanksgiving All!!!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:54 PM) Tbird Accepted To 2015 Conference: V-Wise: Another Entrepreneurship Project Of The Whitman School Of Management Http://ow.ly/ej9Qg
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 04:13 PM) Arng11 Thank You For Your Contribution To Our Funding Campaign.
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 02:57 PM) Thank You Ms T For Starting This Web Site For All Veterans, You Helpd Me And My Family And I'll Be Forever Gratful To You & Hadit.com
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:19 AM) Thank You All For Helping With The Funding The Site. It Is Really Helping!
@  Tbird : (22 November 2014 - 08:18 AM) Britton Pm Me And I. Can Check This Out For You
@  britton : (22 November 2014 - 06:44 AM) What Does ''you Missed Your Quota For Postives Votes Today'' Mean??
@  coriemboh : (19 November 2014 - 08:29 AM) Hold Time For Peggy Was Approximately 1 Minute. That Was 17 Minutes Ago. They Really Need To Change This Hold Music.
@  Tbird : (17 November 2014 - 02:42 PM) Stretch Thanks For The Extra Contribution To Our Fundraiser This Month.
@  maxwell18 : (16 November 2014 - 09:04 PM) I Still Have To Bitch About The Navy Hosp Cutting My Meds By 2/3 On My Norco. I Contacted Customer Service Or What Ever You Want To Call It Who In Turn Contacted The Navy Hosp Pensacola Commander Who In Turn Did Nothing. Thanks To All The People That Are Affair Of There Jobs And I Feel That Medical Malpractice Should Come Into Place. I Guess Just Do What Ever They Want To Because They Can, But Don't Give A Sh T For The Vets That Suppose To Being Supporting From All The Military  organizations. This Is Not The Way They Have Been Trained And Promised To Do. 
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:26 AM) Delayed Onset Tinnitus - Ref To Va Training Letter 10-028 - Link - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/2014/05/06/single-Judge-Application-Va-Training-Letter-10-028-Delayed-Onset-Tinnitus/
@  carlie : (16 November 2014 - 11:03 AM) Here's A Good Tinnitus Link To Check Out From M21-1 Change Dated Jan 10,2014 - Http://veteranclaims.wordpress.com/tag/section-B-Duty-Military-Occupational-Specialty-Mos-Noise-Exposure-Listing-Fast-Letter-10-35-Tinnitus-Hearing-Loss-Vbms-Rating-Decision-Tools/
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:08 AM) "rolled" Not Ruled! :)
@  Asiadaug : (16 November 2014 - 02:07 AM) Thanks. I Have Seen The Fast Ltr 10-35 And Have Seen Cases Where The Va Has Apparently Agreed That Tinnitus Can Have Delayed Onset. I Did Not In Looking Over The Fast Ltr See Where They Had Ruled 10-028 Into That. And, I Am Not Sure In The Vas Issuance Of ‘policy’ Type Letters How They Might Roll In Previous Instructions Into Newer Ones. Maybe There Is Some Intranet Traceability Capability? I Was Just Curious As There ‘appeared’ To Be Conspicuous Absence Of That 10-028. I Am Assuming 10-028 Was Written In 2010. But It May Be I Should Not Assume Anything.
@  carlie : (15 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Asiadaug - You Might Be Looking For Fast Letter 10-35, Http://www.hadit.com/forums/topic/40962-Va-Fl-10-35/ Also Check Out This Link To Links For Delayed Onset Tinnitus - They All Refer Back To Fast Letter 10-35, Https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=Chrome-Instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=Utf-8#q=Tinnitus, Delayed Onset, Va Fast Letter
@  Tbird : (15 November 2014 - 07:50 AM) Asiadaug Searched All Over For Va Training Letter 10-028 But No Luck So Far.
@  Asiadaug : (15 November 2014 - 02:12 AM) Several Cases I've Run Across Mention Va Training Letter 10-028 With Apparent Discussion About Delayed Onset Of Tinnitus. I Have Been Unable To Locate That Trng Ltr. Any Suggestions?
@  Tbird : (12 November 2014 - 05:56 PM) Stretch Thanks For Contributing To Our Fundraising Campairg

Photo

Tort Claim Denied For Statue If Limitations Reconsideration Request


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 ytheydothis

 
ytheydothis

    E-3 Seaman

  • Seaman
  • PipPipPip
  • 20 posts
 

Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:29 AM

I got a reply back denied under sec 2401. I informed a lawyer who i was trying to get to take the case she told me they handle these claims all the time but they dont take cases once they are denied. Do that sound crazy maybe its me.....

The medical eviedence showed i had surgery on the wrong level of the spine. I didnt find out until by way of a mri 12 yrs later. I know their is a discovery rule in their somewhere..but was glad to see that this was the only reason it was denied I thought the lawyer would of jumped right on it. Im still looking for an attorney and I will get a strong IMO.


My question is when i ask for a reconsideration can i let a lawyer handle that or do i have six months to request that or sixty days

#2 Berta

 
Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29055 posts
 

Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:04 AM

"I got a reply back denied under sec 2401. I informed a lawyer who i was trying to get to take the case she told me they handle these claims all the time but they dont take cases once they are denied. Do that sound crazy maybe its me....."
Title 28 USC § 2401(b)

A tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented.




"The medical eviedence showed i had surgery on the wrong level of the spine. I didnt find out until by way of a mri 12 yrs later. I know their is a discovery rule in their somewhere..but was glad to see that this was the only reason it was denied I thought the lawyer would of jumped right on it. Im still looking for an attorney and I will get a strong IMO."


Did you file the SF 95 within 2 years of your knowledge that the surgery involved a potential medical error?

Anyone who discovers or believes they have been malpracticed on by the VA should get a copy of their Med recs right away, then get an IMO, and then if the IMO supports malpractice they need to get a lawyer.

They can file the SF95 themselves if they fear the SOL could run out before they get their med recs and an IMO and a lawyer-
there is SF95 info here in our FTCA forum.

However if the SOL ran out, there is no recourse.

You could however file a Section 1151 claim. Info on that too ere in our FTCA forum.

Section 1151 claims have no SOL.

I just won an additional 1151 award from my original 1151/FTCA matters this past January, and the veteran,who did not live long enough to see his proper VA comp (they malpracticed on my husband and caused his death)
was eligible for the additional 1151 award back to 1992.

There is a 1151 template in our FTCA forum here for this type of VA claim.

#3 Berta

 
Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29055 posts
 

Posted 09 June 2012 - 10:01 AM

In December 2010 you stated here:

o still havent put in a 1151 will they rate it in the proper rating or will i have to submitt another claim under 1151 “

It appeared that you had requested a secondary rating for the additional disability due to the negligence?

What is the status of that claim?

VA has no obligation to consider any issue under 1151 unless the claimant tells them to by clearly filing a claim under Section 1151.

38 USC.

I think I gave you the same 1151 advice in Dec 2010 as I did here today.

Have you filed a Section 1151 claim at all over the past 2 and 1/2 years?

Edited by Berta, 09 June 2012 - 10:04 AM.


#4 ytheydothis

 
ytheydothis

    E-3 Seaman

  • Seaman
  • PipPipPip
  • 20 posts
 

Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:36 PM

Ok Berta i filed the 1151 claim along with other issues it been 24 months without a decision and used the templates here. I discovered i had been malpratice on in June of 2010 by way of a Mri..I had surgery in 1997 took 12 yrs to find this out i thought the discovery rule applied so i filed the sf 95 in may of 2012 well within the two year statue and got a denial back in June of 2012 a fast three week process...Since they denied on statue of limitation maybe i should leave alone and wait on the 1151 process Im thinking if you win a sf 95 dont it offset the 1151 claim.... I know im getting in deep water should i still persue a lawyer to argue that i had no way of knowing until the June 2010 Mri?

If I previal on the 1151 claim will it retro back to 1997? or when i filled the 1151 claim? thanks

#5 Berta

 
Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 29055 posts
 

Posted 10 June 2012 - 08:11 AM

Fighting a SOL denial needs a lawyer's expertise.


“.Since they denied on statue of limitation maybe i should leave alone and wait on the 1151 process Im thinking if you win a sf 95 dont it offset the 1151 claim.... “

Yes and that is why it is often disadvantageous to file both FTCA and 1151.

I invested most of my FTCA settlement because of the offset factor to my DIC.That way I used some interest every month until I was awarded DIC.



The only way around the offset is to prove SC as well, in addition to 1151/FTCA for the same disability but my claim is the only case I know of that was successful that way.

The VA, after another battle with me, refunded my entire offset last year.

The offset regs are here somewhere.

You will need a strong Independent Medical Opinion for the 1151 claim.

These days I foresee no way anyone can win 1151 without an IMO.

Or any FTCA case.

The VA Cannot offset a Section 1151 award to any established SC award.

They might try to 'combine' the percentages but I think that would be a CUE if they did that.I am really not sure on that.