Jump to content



Search



Shoutbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup
@  carlie : (30 August 2014 - 06:27 PM) Vet211060 - I Guess They're Not That Shameful After All : - ) Congrats On Some Positive Adjudication
@  vet201060 : (30 August 2014 - 04:24 PM) Dav Sent Letter Saying I Am 100% Effective Oct 2013
@  MarkInTexas : (30 August 2014 - 12:35 PM) Wish There Was A "like" Button For Some Of These Comments.......
@  MarkInTexas : (30 August 2014 - 12:26 PM) Amen To That!
@  vet201060 : (28 August 2014 - 09:55 PM) Va Is So Shameful!!
@  artlouis : (27 August 2014 - 11:36 AM) Code 7019
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 11:41 PM) Damn Post It Notes
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 11:41 PM) True That
@  Asiadaug : (26 August 2014 - 07:46 PM) I Have Yet To Deal With Any Piece Of Va That Isn't A Dysfunctional Mess...ebenefits, Claim Filing, Billing...and To Think Our Tax Dollars Are Used To Perpetuate That Calamity!
@  carlie : (26 August 2014 - 05:39 PM) notorious kelly - loved your shout ! ! !
@  GlassRose1500 : (26 August 2014 - 03:40 PM) Would Someone Add Smc Housbound Plus Smc A&a Regular And One Smc K For Me? I Can't Seem To Do That Math!
@  Notorious Kelly : (26 August 2014 - 03:12 PM) Ebenefits Is Not A Thermometer In The Rectum Of Your Claim; It Is A Post-It Note That May Or Not Be Updated Or Accurate. Try Not To Obsess ;)
@  mcassidy : (26 August 2014 - 01:25 PM) Osa
@  Jaluluah11B : (26 August 2014 - 10:05 AM) My Reconsideration Finally Showed Up On Ebenefits As A New Claim.  gathering Evidence.  [font=Arial][size=3]Automated 5103 Notice Response Needed. [/size][/font]
@  vet201060 : (26 August 2014 - 10:00 AM) Went From Pending Decision Approval To Review Of Evidence Today, I Need To Stop Looking At It. Drives You Crazy Waiting
@  GlassRose1500 : (25 August 2014 - 09:30 PM) @coriemboh I Get My Best Claim Advice Here, But My Dav Guy Gets The Best Intel Once The Claim Is Filed
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:57 PM) The Average Processing Time Is 9 Months More Or Less. Every Time I Call The 800#, I Get A Different Answer. Goe, Roe....make Up Your Mind!
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:56 PM) I Just Want To Know Ballpark Figure Of How Much Longer My Claim Will Take. The Bills Are Piling Up. Adds To My Anxiety And Depression. Sure Wish I Could Tell Bill Collectors The Same Things Va Tells Me!
@  coriemboh : (25 August 2014 - 08:54 PM) @glassrose1500-No, I Don't. I Put In For Representation A Few Days Ago, But I'm Sure That End Won't Pan Out Until The Claim Is Closed.
@  GlassRose1500 : (25 August 2014 - 12:11 PM) Would Appreciate Feedback On My Smc Draft - Posted In The Smc Section! Tkx!

Photo

The Ro Did Not Properly Apply The Presumption Of Service Connection Law For Certain Chronic Diseases...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic

#1 carlie

 
carlie

    Moderator/Admin/HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22064 posts
 

Posted 10 July 2012 - 03:57 AM

http://www.va.gov/ve...es5/1146734.txt

2011 BVA grants CUE on 1993 decision -

However, the RO failed to discuss whether the post-service carpal tunnel surgery, which had to have occurred within one year of the Veteran's May 1992 discharge from service, demonstrated that carpal tunnel syndrome was manifest to a degree of ten percent or more within one year after service. Since it was undisputed the Veteran had undergone carpal tunnel release surgery as evidenced by his surgical scars in early 1993, the necessity for surgery at that time as directed by a physician confirms his carpal tunnel disorder must have been manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more prior to his surgery. See 38 C.F.R. §§ 4.124a (1993), Diagnostic Code 8515 (paralysis of the median nerve, only requiring "mild" symptoms to warrant a 10 percent rating). The RO did not properly apply the presumption of service connection law for certain chronic diseases (organic diseases of the nervous system) that are manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within one year of discharge. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 1112, 1113 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.307, 3.309 (1993).

Therefore, the statutory and regulatory provisions extant at the time of the August 1993 rating decision were incorrectly applied. In short, the RO in August 1993 committed legal error. In addition, the RO's failure to properly consider the one-year presumption for chronic diseases was outcome determinative as the decision as to service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome would have been manifestly different if the law was correctly applied. Fugo, 6 Vet. App. 43-44. That is, the outcome of the Veteran receiving the award of service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome would have been undebatable at that time.

Reasonable minds could not have differed as to whether the law in August 1993 entitled the Veteran to presumptive service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome at that time. Therefore, the error committed by the RO in failing to properly address the one-year presumption for service connection for certain chronic diseases was clear and unmistakable. Fugo, 6 Vet. App. 43-44.

The Board finds clear and unmistakable error in the August 1993 rating decision as to the denial of service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome at that time. 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a). On correction due to CUE, the Veteran is entitled to service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome as if such decision was made at the time of the August 1993 rating decision.

Advertise Here

 

#2 broncovet

 
broncovet

    E-9 Master Chief Petty Officer

  • Master Chief Petty Officer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3618 posts
 

Posted 10 July 2012 - 06:20 AM

Good job Carlie.
This is a good example that the RO really does have to follow VA regulations, or its CUE, as long as the error is "outcome determinative".
I wonder if this passed through a DRO review, where an experienced person should have caught this error. This Vet should never have had to go to the BVA for this.




Advertise Here