disappointment's with the features,data provided and inaccuracies I find
when accessing ebenefits.
Below is shown under my Compensation & Pension Claim Status on ebenefits.
1) This issue has been under Appeal for well over 10 years.
BVA sent this issue back to the VARO - not under remand but under
instruction to take action on the issue, as if it has never been addressed
or denied, NOD submitted, Decision as a result of DRO Hearing negated to
mention this issue. The issue is listed on my I-9 Substantial Appeal, the issue
is discussed at two separate BVA Hearings . . .
and this is where VBA has it for now - - - as if it is a new claim that was
received on 03/26/2012.
It was of record to have a decision made under BVA's jurisdiction.
BVA negated to acknowledge they legally had jurisdiction on this
issue and just passed the buck back to the VARO.
2) Why in the world at this point does the VARO need to do
"Requested verification of military benefits"?
Does the VARO not already know what military benefits they are
already providing - and if not, then should it take them from
08/06/2012 to 09/05/2012 - to find out ?
The entire process is just plain ludicrous !
Details of Your Claim
Claim Received: 03/26/2012
Claim Type: Compensation
Estimated Claim Completion Date: 09/19/2012 to 02/15/2013
Claims Status Process
Skip the Claims Process and go to the current phase.
- Claim Received
- Gathering of Evidence
This is a list of all items that have been requested from 3rd parties.
Items From Date Requested Due Date Follow-Up Dates Requested verification of military benefits. 08/06/2012 09/05/2012