Jump to content


Photo

Reopen Claim That Has Nod Since 2011


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 klovisk

klovisk

    E-3 Seaman

  • Seaman
  • PipPipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Interests:The universe and allthings spiritual
  • Service Connected Disability: 100%
  • Branch of Service: USA

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:18 AM

Hello, I am confused as to why the VARO reopened a right knee claim that has been in appeal since 05/2011. In March 2013 I faxed the RO and pointed out that my SMR has treatment records of my right knee in service. They had previously stated that I was denied because there was no proof that the injuries ocurred in service.

Also, the 05/2011 NOD includes back and left knee, which are being reviewed for an increase (don't know why the date is changed to 03/2013).

 

05/04/2011 Notice of Disagreement (NOD) RO 05/11/2011 Appeal Pending BVA

 


Claim Received: 03/19/2013
Claim Type: Compensation
Estimated Claim Completion Date: 12/01/2013 to 06/04/2014

Contentions: back condition (Increase), left knee condition (Increase), right knee condition (Reopen)
Claims Status Process



#2 Berta

Berta

    HadIt.com Elder/SVR Radio Panelist

  • SVR
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28049 posts
  • Location:Beautiful hills of NY
  • Interests:tactical warfare student- AMU
    gardening
    fishing
    Oriental home design
    organic cleaning tips
    Capt Adoph Von Shell-interested in any info at all!
    German Commander (WWI)lectured to the US Army after the war on warfare-- PTSD - tactics etc-and Leadership
    The Pullers-Chesty and Lewis (USMC)
    chocolate brownies
    anything at all regarding Vietnam
    the failure of the Maginot Line (WWII)
    Trench warfare
    anything amphibious

    Led Zepplin, Bob Dylan, Sting, Al Green, Mozart, Classical guitar,Moog synthesizer, Eminem,Janis Joplin,
    Michael Jackson, Teddy Pendergast, Mongo Santamaria,
    Cal Tjader, Miles Davis, AmerIndian battle chants,
    Hendrix,etc etc etc
    Pho and nuc mam dinners
  • Service Connected Disability: widow of 2 vets, 2 HD each and mother of USAF vet-my daughter

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:01 PM

It sounds to me as though they might call a CUE on themselves and reverse the  decision you filed the NOD on.

 

Orr they are now considering the claim based on 'newly discovered Service records."

(38 CFR 3.156 et al)

 

"In March 2013 I faxed the RO and pointed out that my SMR has treatment records of my right knee in service. They had previously stated that I was denied because there was no proof that the injuries ocurred in service." That has changed everything on the right knee claim.

 

Do you yourself have copies of those SMRs?

 

This really gets me...why didnt the VA pick up on the inservice treatment when you originally filed the claim.

Sometimes I wonder if they even read SMRs and this is why it is always a good idea to highlight on a copy of pertinent SMRs with a bright mgjic marker and refer to the entries along with the rest of the evidence being sent in for the claim.( to include an evidence list and sent in with a Proof of mailing.)

 

Good for you! You didn't let them get away with that erroneous denial.



#3 klovisk

klovisk

    E-3 Seaman

  • Seaman
  • PipPipPip
  • 15 posts
  • Interests:The universe and allthings spiritual
  • Service Connected Disability: 100%
  • Branch of Service: USA

Posted 02 April 2013 - 05:38 PM

Thank you for your response. I do have a copy of my SMR's. It is hard for me to digest, understand and remember things, but at least I finally caught the error. It scares me that the CnP doctor and the RO did not see this themselves. I know that we are our best advocate to win our claims, so I do try to read and re-read my documents, to make sure I did not miss something. I had my SMR records since 2010, but it took this long to understand that the RO said the injuries did not occur in service, while in fact my SMR records say otherwise.

 

Thank you again for the assistance you provide. It is very much appreciated.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users