Panel Application; Delrio v. Wilkie, 32 Vet.App. 232, 243 (2019); Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 40 (1994); context for subjective terms contained in the DC; the Board simply relied on the November 2017 examiner’s assessment that Mr. Chavis’s radiculopathy was moderate in severity, R. at 11-12; however, “the Board cannot uncritically adopt an examiner’s assessment of the veteran’s level of disability as its own without reconciling that assessment with the other evidence of record,” Delrio v. Wilkie, 32 Vet.App. 232, 243 (2019) (citing Gabrielson v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 36, 40 (1994) (noting that a medical opinion is “only that, an opinion” providing medical evidence)). As the Board failed to provide context for subjective terms contained in the DC, the Court agrees with the parties and concludes that the Board failed to provide adequate reasons or bases for its decision. See Caluza, 7 Vet.App. at 506; - Veterans VA Disability Claim Community