;
VA Claims: Disabled Veterans Community|Hadit.com

Missouri Approves Medical Marijuana – PTSD included among treatable disabilities

Medical Marijuana legalized in Missouri for PTSD. Time to start parting my hair in the middle and wearing those doper dark glasses. I don’t think we will actually see anything till 2020 maybe late 2019. All kidding aside there are several disabilities that a doctor can recommend it for including the following:
What conditions qualify?

Missouri Medical Marijuana Frequently Asked Questions

  • Cancer;
  • Epilepsy;
  • Glaucoma;
  • Intractable migraines unresponsive to other treatment;
  • A chronic medical condition that causes severe, persistent pain or persistent muscle spasms, including but not limited to those associated with multiple sclerosis, seizures, Parkinson’s disease, and Tourette’s syndrome;
  • Debilitating psychiatric disorders, including, but not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder, if diagnosed by a state licensed psychiatrist;
  • A chronic medical condition that is normally treated with a prescription medication that could lead to physical or psychological dependence, when a physician determines that medical use of marijuana could be effective in treating that condition and would serve as a safer alternative to the prescription medication;
  • Any terminal illness; or
  • In the professional judgment of a physician, any other chronic, debilitating or other medical condition, including, but not limited to, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, Huntington’s disease, autism, neuropathies, sickle cell anemia, agitation of Alzheimer’s disease, cachexia and wasting syndrome.

Veterans Suicide – An American Legion White Paper

Suicide prevention is a top priority of The American Legion.
Deeply concerned about the number of military veterans who take their own lives at rates higher than that of the general population, the nation’s largest organization of wartime veterans established a Suicide Prevention Program under the supervision of its TBI/PTSD standing committee, which reports to the national Veterans Affairs & Rehabilitation Commission.
The TBI/PTSD Committee reviews methods, programs and strategies that can be used to treat traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In order to reduce veteran suicide, this committee seeks to influence legislation and operational policies that can improve treatment and reduce suicide among veterans, regardless of their service eras.
This white paper report examines recent trends in veteran suicide and their potential causes and recommends steps to address this public health crisis.

Since 2001, the U.S. military has been actively engaged in combat operations on multiple continents in the Global War on Terror.More than 3 million Americans have served in Iraq or Afghanistan through the first 17 years of the war. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have become known as the “signature wounds” of the war, and in recent years, countless studies, articles and reports have documented an inordinately high suicide rate among those who have come home from the war, those of previous war eras and among active-duty personnel.

The American Legion is deeply concerned by the high suicide rate among service- members and veterans, which has increased substantially since 2001.1 The suicide rate among 18-24-year-old male Iraq and Afghanistan veterans is particularly troubling, having risen nearly fivefold to an all-time high of 124 per 100,000, 10 times the national average. A spike has also occurred in the suicide rate of 18-29-year-old female veterans, doubling from 5.7 per 100,000 to 11 per 100,000.2 These increases are startling when compared to rates of other demographics of veterans, whose suicide rates have stayed constant during the same time period.

Read the full report below:
American Legion White Paper on Veteran Suicide by Jared Keller

4 Powerful Ways to Improve Our VA Claims – From Veterans Court decisions

With 10 years of representing Veterans before VA Regional Offices all around the country and the BVA, I have a firm belief that Veterans can improve their VA Claims by following 8 Steps to Improve their VA Claim A recent non-precedential opinion of the Veterans Court seemed to follow those Steps in  pointing out the flaws in a BVA decision.
Guest Post from Veterans Law Blog
A recent non-precedential opinion of the Veterans Court seemed to follow those Steps in  pointing out the flaws in a BVA decision.
I’m going to teach you how the Veterans Court taught us the value of 4 of those Steps in a Vietnam Veteran’s PTSD increase claim:

General Facts of the Thomas Case.

The Veteran – who served in Vietnam from April 1969 – November 1970 – challenged the VA’s decision to grant an Impairment Rating of 10% for his  PTSD.  The Veteran thought he was entitled to a higher rating, above 50%.
The Veteran included — among other things — the following evidence in his claim:
  1. A statement from his wife that he “sat up all night waiting on the enemy”.
  2. VA Medical exam documenting suicidal and homicidal thoughts, hearing noises that sounded like booms
  3. A VA Medical exam that diagnosed the Veteran as “malingering”
  4. A private medical opinion that diagnosed PTSD, and documented poor short-term memory, poor coping skills, and an inability to handle changes in stressful situations
  5. A VA Medical Exam that documented intrusive daily thoughts of Vietnam, twice weekly nightmares, difficulty sleeping, problems concentrating, and detachment from others.
  6. VA Exams that documented hearing non-existent gunfire, isolation, jail time for fighting with his wife, and more.  The Veteran for example, did not know the 1st US President, concluded that 5+4 equalled 20, and thought the colors of the US flag were red and white.
  7. A private medical exam with a GAF Score of 49, and a statement that the Veteran was “adequately reliable” in the information he provided, given his level of functioning due to the mental health condition.
  8. A VA exam which “Un-diagnosed” malingering.
  9. A lot more favorable — and unfavorable — medical evidence, from private and VA practitioners.
The BVA, in 2012 (3 years after the most recent denial of the claim in 2009), concluded that the Veteran was not credible, and (this point may be arguable) that anybody who relied on the Veteran was not credible, and gave a “thumbs-up” to the VA on its denial of the increased impairment rating for Post Traumatic Stress (PTS, or PTSD).
In 2014, the Veterans’ Court vacated and remanded the BVA Decision.
The Veterans’ Court was concerned with the BVA decision: a common theme running through the decision is how the BVA assessed the evidence — not the weighing of it (the Veteran’s Court cannot weigh evidence).
Instead, the Court thought that the BVA did not properly assess legal issues related to the evidence-something that is wholly within the bailiwick of the Veteran’s Court.
And that is where the Court’s lesson begins.
[Editorial Note: The Court’s decision was not intended as a lesson — it was an opinion based on the law and facts of the case.  Reference to the “lesson” in the Court’s decision is based on my assessment of how other Veterans can LEARN from this case, and improve their OWN VA Claim or Appeal, hopefully, before it ever gets to the BVA.]

Lesson 1: Get your C&P Exam Results IMMEDIATELY after the exam (Step 2: Get your Claims File NOW!)

If you wait to  see your C-File until you are at the BVA – or worse, before the Veterans Court – you will have very little time to get evidence in the record to counter very negative evidence like a diagnosis of malingering.
I recommend that Veterans request their C-File from the VA shortly after the VA C&P Exam.  If you already have your C-File, then request the 3 documents that comprise the C&P Exam: the VBA Request for an exam (formerly, the VA Form 2507), the Examiner’s notes, and the Opinion itself.
This eBook has instructions how to get not only your C-File, but also all 3 documents that comprise the VA C&P Exams in a way that the VA MUST comply with:

Lesson 2: You must use “5 Star Evidence”.  (Step 5: Use 5 Star Evidence)

The 1st Star is Competence.   Competence is largely about WHO can offer certain evidence.
The 2nd Star is Credibility. Credibility is about the WEIGHT that the BVA should assign to individual “pieces” of evidence.
In this case, the BVA appears to have — without explanation-decided that any evidence (except the VA Medical evidence) that relied on the Veteran’s statements lacked CREDIBILITY.
What saved this Veteran was 2 things: first, he had a LOT of COMPETENT medical and lay evidence from a lot of sources that recorded their first-hand observations — not just echoing what the Veteran said.
Because that evidence was in the file, the BVA’s error started when it gave less weight to competent evidence that it thought lacked credibility, without explanation.
Lesson? If lay evidence is the bullet, and medical evidence is the rifle, when you are trying to service connect and/or properly rate a mental health condition you will need a LOT of bullets.
In this eBook, I have 2 worksheets that will help you identify as much Lay Evidence of Symptoms and Limitations as you can, as well as a template for a Sworn Declaration that may save you the costs of Notary Fees while demonstrating the credibility of your lay evidence:

Lesson 3: Fight the Right Battle on the Right Battlefield (Step 6: Choose Your Battlefield)

The Veterans Court reviews LEGAL issues.
The Veterans Court cannot weigh evidence (unless the BVA weighing was clearly erroneous — and those decisions are rare).
Since the BVA Weighs evidence, you need to be spending that 2.5 year period between decision and BVA Hearing getting as much lay and medical evidence into your file as you can.
Submit the evidence in a way that makes it easier for the BVA Judge to see why you have the better facts than it would be for the BVA Judge to deny your claim.
If you get a bad C&P exam calling you a mooching faker with PTSD, go out and get a private exam/opinion.  Ask that examiner diagnose your condition, review all of the evidence in your C-File (and say that he/she did that review), ANDoffer an opinion as to the adequacy — or inadequacy of the VA Exam/Opinion.
You can learn about the stages of the VA Claims Process – and what happens at each stage — in this eBook:

Lesson 4:  A Diagnosis of Malingering is an Atomic Bomb in Your VA Claim. (Step 7: Get Help)

Malingering is a “medical condition” in and of itself.
Though there are strict criteria for diagnosing it which are not often followed, and criteria that need to be distinguished from other conditions or symptoms of other conditions (such as complex avoidance  strategies or hyperbolic cries for help), it is a dangerous diagnosis to carry through the VA Claims Process.
It cannot be left unanswered, in my opinion.
I have a real problem with the word ‘malingering’.
First, I have only seen ONE soldier ‘malinger’ in the last 20 years.  Its just not that common in the Veterans’ community — this is a group of people who have “fulfill your mission despite your personal pain”pounded into them from Day One of Boot Camp.
Here’s the story of the 1 Malinger-er that I knew.  The soldier smashed his fingers with a fire extinguisher to get out of a Field Training Exercise. Joke was on him, in the end. He got busted a rank AND had to go on the exercise anyway — working as the Colonel’s radio operator due to his busted fingers.
This particular Colonel was a notorious pain-in-the-a** to work for.  In fact, it was rumored that he had a Layer of Hell named after him.  One of these days I’ll have to tell you about his escapades.
Second, one Veteran recently told me of a VA Doctor who said that 60% of Veterans are malingerers, and that his cure for the backlog was to dismiss all PTSD claimants as “malingerers”.
That’s some scary stuff to hear from a medical professional.
Aren’t they supposed to treat — not judge?
And how do you know if your PTSD condition is in the 40% or the 60%? Seriously, that’s a scary comment from a VA Doctor.
Any time you see the word “malinger” in your case — or any word that suggests malingering — the best thing for you to do is get in touch with an attorney ASAP.  That is going to need to be fixed, or its going to haunt your claim — as it did Mr. Thomas’s – for years.

The Thomas Case